Knez A, Haberl R, Steinbeck G
Medizinische Klinik I, Universität München, Klinikum Grosshadern.
Z Kardiol. 1994;83 Suppl 5:71-3.
The role of cardiac glycosides for conversion of atrial fibrillation to simus rhythm is controversially discussed. In a prospective study, 45 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups (of 15 patients each). Group I received oral digoxin, three times 0.125 mg up to twice 0.25 mg daily; group II oral digoxin twice 0.125 mg and quinidine hydrogen sulphate 750-1000 mg daily; group III oral digoxin three times 0.125 mg and flecaimide 200-300 mg daily. During a mean observation period of 11 months, digoxin alone was significantly less effective (p < 0.05) in reducing or suppressing paroxyms of atrial fibrillation than digoxin plus quinidine or flecainide. The use of digoxin remains a mainstay of treatment for rate control in atrial fibrillation. To convert atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm, however, the addition of a type I or III antiarrhythmic agent is necessary.
关于强心苷在将心房颤动转复为窦性心律方面的作用,存在着争议性的讨论。在一项前瞻性研究中,45例阵发性心房颤动患者被随机分为三个治疗组(每组15例)。第一组口服地高辛,每日3次,每次0.125mg,最多每日2次,每次0.25mg;第二组口服地高辛,每日2次,每次0.125mg,加硫酸奎尼丁750 - 1000mg;第三组口服地高辛,每日3次,每次0.125mg,加氟卡胺200 - 300mg。在平均11个月的观察期内,单独使用地高辛在减少或抑制心房颤动发作方面明显不如地高辛加奎尼丁或氟卡胺有效(p < 0.05)。地高辛的使用仍然是心房颤动心率控制治疗的主要手段。然而,要将心房颤动转复为窦性心律,则需要加用I类或III类抗心律失常药物。