Suppr超能文献

患者和对照者粪便样本中紧密黏附并消除性大肠杆菌的患病率。

Prevalence of attaching and effacing Escherichia coli in stool samples from patients and controls.

作者信息

Schmidt H, Rüssmann H, Schwarzkopf A, Aleksic S, Heesemann J, Karch H

机构信息

Institut für Hygiene und Mikrobiologie, Universität Würzburg.

出版信息

Zentralbl Bakteriol. 1994 Aug;281(2):201-13. doi: 10.1016/s0934-8840(11)80571-2.

Abstract

Enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) and enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) have the ability to cause 'attaching and effacing' (AE) lesions; the genes necessary to cause AE in both of these pathogroups have been identified and termed eae. Using colony hybridization, we screened 237 stool samples from patients with diarrhea, and 237 stool samples from age-matched controls for the presence of E. coli carrying eae. Individual colonies harbouring eae could be recovered from 7 (2.9%) of the patient stools, as well as from 6 (2.5%) of the control stools. All these E. coli isolates were positive in the fluorescence actin staining (FAS) test. In addition, all the samples were also probed for Shiga-like toxin (slt) genes and the EPEC adherence factor (EAF) to evaluate whether testing for eae identified all EHEC and class I EPEC. Of the 7 patient samples harbouring E. coli with eae, 4 had E. coli with eae and slt genes, and 2 had E. coli with eae and EAF sequences. In 2 of the 237 patient stools, E. coli which were eae and EAF negative but slt probe positive could be recovered. These 2 E. coli strains were non-reactive in the FAS test. Of the control samples, none of the E. coli strains, including the 6 samples containing eae positive strains, possessed EAF or slt-sequences. In concrete terms, the similar eae incidence found in both E. coli isolates from patients and controls is currently of limited clinical diagnostic value and more importantly, the eae probe could not identify all slt-harbouring E. coli. On the basis of these results, the use of the eae-probe cannot be recommended in preference to the slt probes for the detection of EHEC.

摘要

肠道致病性大肠杆菌(EPEC)和肠出血性大肠杆菌(EHEC)具有导致“紧密黏附与抹平”(AE)损伤的能力;已鉴定出这两个致病菌群中导致AE所需的基因,并将其命名为eae。我们采用菌落杂交法,对237份腹泻患者的粪便样本以及237份年龄匹配的对照者粪便样本进行筛查,以检测携带eae的大肠杆菌。从7份(2.9%)患者粪便以及6份(2.5%)对照者粪便中分离出了携带eae的单个菌落。所有这些大肠杆菌分离株在荧光肌动蛋白染色(FAS)试验中均呈阳性。此外,还对所有样本检测了志贺样毒素(slt)基因和EPEC黏附因子(EAF),以评估检测eae是否能鉴定出所有的EHEC和I类EPEC。在7份携带含eae大肠杆菌的患者样本中,4份样本中的大肠杆菌同时携带eae和slt基因,2份样本中的大肠杆菌同时携带eae和EAF序列。在237份患者粪便样本中的2份中,分离出了eae和EAF阴性但slt探针阳性的大肠杆菌。这2株大肠杆菌在FAS试验中无反应。在对照样本中,所有大肠杆菌菌株,包括6份含eae阳性菌株的样本,均不具有EAF或slt序列。具体而言,在患者和对照者的大肠杆菌分离株中发现的相似eae发生率目前临床诊断价值有限,更重要的是,eae探针无法鉴定出所有携带slt的大肠杆菌。基于这些结果,在检测EHEC时,不推荐优先使用eae探针而非slt探针。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验