Brun J
Department of Family Medicine, University of Uppsala, Sweden.
J Int Med Res. 1994 Sep-Oct;22(5):266-72. doi: 10.1177/030006059402200503.
This study compares patient compliance with once- and twice-daily formulations of 5-isosorbide mononitrate. A total of 31 patients (20 men and 11 women) with stable angina pectoris were randomized to receive either 60 mg 5-isosorbide mononitrate in a controlled release formulation once daily, or 20 mg 5-isosorbide mononitrate twice daily. The results indicated that compliance assessed using the electronic Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS) was better with the once-daily than with the twice-daily formulation; patients on the once-daily regimen performed better with respect to the total number of bottle openings, the number of openings per day, the timing of openings and the intervals between openings. The apparently superior compliance with the once-daily regimen appeared to be reflected in better efficacy; patients on the once-daily regimen experienced fewer angina attacks (a mean of 1.7 per 7 days, compared with 3.3 per 7 days for patients on the twice-daily regimen) and used fewer nitroglycerin tablets than those on the twice-daily regimen.
本研究比较了患者对5-单硝酸异山梨酯每日一次和每日两次剂型的依从性。共有31例稳定型心绞痛患者(20例男性和11例女性)被随机分为两组,一组接受每日一次60mg控释剂型的5-单硝酸异山梨酯,另一组接受每日两次20mg的5-单硝酸异山梨酯。结果表明,使用电子药物事件监测系统(MEMS)评估的依从性,每日一次剂型优于每日两次剂型;每日一次给药方案的患者在药瓶开启总数、每日开启次数、开启时间和开启间隔方面表现更好。每日一次给药方案明显更高的依从性似乎反映在更好的疗效上;每日一次给药方案的患者心绞痛发作次数较少(平均每7天1.7次,而每日两次给药方案的患者为每7天3.3次),且硝酸甘油片的使用量比每日两次给药方案的患者少。