Suppr超能文献

封闭性和半封闭性敷料对犬前肢急性全层皮肤伤口愈合的影响。

The effect of occlusive and semi-occlusive dressings on the healing of acute full-thickness skin wounds on the forelimbs of dogs.

作者信息

Morgan P W, Binnington A G, Miller C W, Smith D A, Valliant A, Prescott J F

机构信息

Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Canada.

出版信息

Vet Surg. 1994 Nov-Dec;23(6):494-502. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1994.tb00511.x.

Abstract

This project compared the effects of hydrocolloid (HC) and hydrogel (HG) occlusive dressings and a polyethylene (PE) semi-occlusive dressing on the healing of acute full-thickness skin wounds on the forelimbs of 10 dogs. All treatments resulted in a similar degree of healing at postoperative days 4 and 7. No significant differences existed in the number of wounds that were more than 90% healed at postoperative day 28 between the group treated with the HG dressing and the group treated with the PE dressing. There were significantly fewer wounds more than 90% healed at postoperative day 28 in the group treated with the HC dressing. Wounds under the HG dressing had the largest mean percentage of contraction at postoperative days 21 and 28. Wounds under the HG dressing also had the largest contraction/re-epithelialization ratio (postoperative days 21 and 28) compared with wounds under the PE and HC dressings. Wounds under the PE dressing had a significantly higher mean percentage of re-epithelialization than wounds under both occlusive dressings on postoperative days 14, 21, and 28. Wounds under the two occlusive dressings had exuberant granulation tissue present more often than wounds under the PE dressing. The two occlusive dressings had significantly higher bacterial counts on wounds compared with wounds under the PE dressing; analysis of variance (ANOVA), P = .0008. Wounds under the HC dressing showed the poorest healing in all parameters.

摘要

本项目比较了水胶体(HC)敷料、水凝胶(HG)敷料和聚乙烯(PE)半封闭敷料对10只犬前肢急性全层皮肤伤口愈合的影响。在术后第4天和第7天,所有治疗方法的愈合程度相似。在术后第28天,使用HG敷料治疗的组和使用PE敷料治疗的组中,愈合超过90%的伤口数量没有显著差异。使用HC敷料治疗的组在术后第28天愈合超过90%的伤口明显更少。在术后第21天和第28天,HG敷料覆盖的伤口平均收缩百分比最大。与PE和HC敷料覆盖的伤口相比,HG敷料覆盖的伤口在术后第21天和第28天的收缩/再上皮化率也最大。在术后第14天、21天和28天,PE敷料覆盖的伤口平均再上皮化百分比显著高于两种封闭敷料覆盖的伤口。两种封闭敷料覆盖的伤口比PE敷料覆盖的伤口更常出现肉芽组织过度增生。与PE敷料覆盖的伤口相比,两种封闭敷料覆盖的伤口细菌计数显著更高;方差分析(ANOVA),P = 0.0008。在所有参数方面,HC敷料覆盖的伤口愈合最差。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验