Healing of full-thickness wounds in pigs: effects of occlusive and non-occlusive dressings associated with a gel vehicle.

This study, based upon a pig model, was conducted to investigate the effects of moist and dry healing conditions on wound closure (epithelialization, granulation tissue, contraction) of full-thickness wounds. Thirty-two full-thickness square wounds (3 cm x 3 cm) covered with either an occlusive polyurethane dressing (Tegaderm) or a non-occlusive dressing (Melolin) were evaluated. The effect of the presence or the absence of a gel (3% Idroramnosan) was also investigated with both dressings. The dressings were renewed twice a week. The time required for wound closure was 19.2 +/- 1.6 days for Tegaderm and 26.6 +/- 3.0 days (means +/- SD) for Melolin, respectively. The healing time of the full-thickness porcine wounds was significantly (P < 0.001) reduced by the occlusive dressing. Equivalent results were found with the 3% gel, indicating that the gel can be used as a neutral vehicle. The healing rate, calculated according to Gilman's method, was also significantly (P < 0.001) enhanced by the occlusive dressing. This progression was 0.073 +/- 0.004 cm/day and 0.050 +/- 0.009 cm/day (means +/- SD) for Tegaderm and Melolin, respectively. The contribution of contraction to wound closure was similar in all wounds, indicating that the occlusive dressing did not have an effect on wound contraction. Histological evaluation was performed on full-thickness skin biopsies of whole wound harvested from the time of wound closure to 3 months after. At any time point, no significant histological variations were observed between the different treated wounds. This study demonstrates in a porcine model that for full-thickness wounds, as for split-thickness wounds, occlusive dressing enhances healing rate and shortens the time for wound repair. The shortened healing time is a function primarily of the effect of occlusive dressing on epithelialization, especially the third phase of wound resurfacing.