Gearan P, Schoenberger N E, Kirsch I
Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs 06269-1020.
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1995 Jan;43(1):70-89. doi: 10.1080/00207149508409376.
The effects of the Carleton Skills Training Program (CSTP) on hypnotizability were compared to those of a modified training program in which instructions for physical enactment of the response were omitted. After training, subjects in the original CSTP reported an increase in the extent to which they intentionally enacted suggested behaviors. In contrast, subjects in the modified training program reported increased fantasy without voluntary physical enactment. Nevertheless, both training programs increased behavioral and subjective responsiveness to suggestion, and there were no significant differences in response enhancement between the two programs. Across conditions, increases in behavioral and subjective responses to suggestion were correlated with increased use of fantasy. In contrast, increases in enactment were correlated only with compliance. The modified training program is recommended as a means of enhancing suggestibility with less likelihood than the original CSTP of engendering compliance.
将卡尔顿技能培训计划（CSTP）对催眠易感性的影响与一个修改后的培训计划进行了比较，在修改后的培训计划中，省略了对反应进行身体表现的指导。训练后，原始CSTP组的受试者报告说，他们有意表现出暗示行为的程度有所增加。相比之下，修改后的培训计划组的受试者报告说，幻想增加了，但没有自主的身体表现。然而，两个培训计划都提高了对暗示的行为和主观反应性，并且两个计划在反应增强方面没有显著差异。在所有条件下，对暗示的行为和主观反应的增加与幻想使用的增加相关。相比之下，表现的增加仅与依从性相关。推荐使用修改后的培训计划作为增强暗示性的一种方法，与原始CSTP相比，产生依从性的可能性较小。
