An Q, Olive D M
Gene-Trak Systems Corporation, Framingham, MA 01701.
Mol Cell Probes. 1994 Oct;8(5):429-35. doi: 10.1006/mcpr.1994.1061.
We have examined the relationship between Chlamydia trachomatis found in clinical samples in which the cryptic plasmid was absent and known serovars of C. trachomatis. PCR and RNase protection assays were used to compare 12 C. trachomatis serovars and a plasmidless L2 serovar strain with the reactivity of clinical specimens taken from patients with pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) containing the C. trachomatis 16S rRNA gene and 16S rRNA but lacking plasmid DNA. Serovars D, E, H and I were unreactive in either or both of the PCR and RNase protection assays. The plasmidless L2 strain had reactivities indistinguishable from the nucleic acids found in the PID clinical specimens. Serovar D, the plasmidless L2 strain, and nucleic acids from two of the PID specimens were further compared by amplifying, cloning and sequencing the 16S rRNA genes detected in these samples. The sequences of the 16S rRNA genes detected in the PID clinical samples and the 16S rRNA gene of the plasmidless C. trachomatis variant were indistinguishable from previously reported sequences of the C. trachomatis 16S rRNA. Serovar D showed five base changes over the same region. We conclude that although these clinical samples lack the C. trachomatis cryptic plasmid, they do contain C. trachomatis nucleic acid.
我们研究了临床样本中未发现隐匿质粒的沙眼衣原体与已知沙眼衣原体血清型之间的关系。采用聚合酶链反应(PCR)和核糖核酸酶保护试验,将12种沙眼衣原体血清型和一种无质粒的L2血清型菌株与取自盆腔炎(PID)患者的临床标本的反应性进行比较,这些临床标本含有沙眼衣原体16S核糖体RNA(rRNA)基因和16S rRNA,但缺乏质粒DNA。血清型D、E、H和I在PCR和核糖核酸酶保护试验中的一项或两项中均无反应。无质粒的L2菌株的反应性与PID临床标本中发现的核酸无法区分。通过对这些样本中检测到的16S rRNA基因进行扩增、克隆和测序,进一步比较了血清型D、无质粒的L2菌株以及两个PID标本的核酸。在PID临床样本中检测到的16S rRNA基因序列和无质粒沙眼衣原体变体的16S rRNA基因序列与先前报道的沙眼衣原体16S rRNA序列无法区分。血清型D在同一区域显示出五个碱基变化。我们得出结论,尽管这些临床样本缺乏沙眼衣原体隐匿质粒,但它们确实含有沙眼衣原体核酸。