Magbanua Jose Paolo V, Goh Beng Tin, Michel Claude-Edouard, Aguirre-Andreasen Aura, Alexander Sarah, Ushiro-Lumb Ines, Ison Catherine, Lee Helen
Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, EABC Site, Long Road, Cambridge CB2 2PT, UK.
Sex Transm Infect. 2007 Jul;83(4):339-43. doi: 10.1136/sti.2007.026435. Epub 2007 Jun 13.
To characterise a Chlamydia trachomatis variant strain from a patient with non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU) whose first void urine (FVU) displayed discrepant Ctrachomatis test results and describe the clinical response to treatment.
The FVU specimen was assayed with an immune based Chlamydia Rapid Test (CRT) and various nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) to establish C trachomatis infection. Sequencing of the major outer membrane protein gene (omp1 also known as ompA) was undertaken to identify the serovar of the variant strain. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis was also conducted to determine whether the strain harboured deletions in the cryptic plasmid or was plasmid free.
The FVU specimen was strongly reactive in CRT but negative with the plasmid based Amplicor PCR (Roche) and ProbeTec ET (Becton-Dickinson) assays. However, NAATs for 16S RNA (Aptima Combo 2, GenProbe), omp1 (RealArt CT PCR, Artus and in-house NAATs) or the outer membrane complex B protein gene (omcB) established C trachomatis infection. Sequencing of omp1 showed that the variant belonged to serovar I. PCR analysis indicated that the variant was plasmid free. The patient did not respond to single dose azithromycin treatment but subsequently responded to a course of doxycycline.
A pathogenic plasmid free C trachomatis variant was identified. Clinicians should be alerted to the possibility of undetected C trachomatis infection caused by such variants and the potential of azithromycin failure in patients with recurrent chlamydial NGU. The occurrence of this variant is rare and should not form the basis for judgment of the performance or usefulness of plasmid based NAATs for C trachomatis detection.
对一名非淋菌性尿道炎(NGU)患者的沙眼衣原体变异株进行特征分析,该患者的首次晨尿(FVU)沙眼衣原体检测结果存在差异,并描述其对治疗的临床反应。
使用基于免疫的衣原体快速检测(CRT)和各种核酸扩增检测(NAATs)对FVU标本进行检测,以确定沙眼衣原体感染情况。对主要外膜蛋白基因(omp1,也称为ompA)进行测序,以鉴定变异株的血清型。还进行了聚合酶链反应(PCR)分析,以确定该菌株是否在隐蔽质粒中存在缺失或无质粒。
FVU标本在CRT中呈强反应性,但基于质粒的Amplicor PCR(罗氏公司)和ProbeTec ET(贝克顿-迪金森公司)检测为阴性。然而,针对16S RNA(Aptima Combo 2,GenProbe)、omp1(RealArt CT PCR、Artus和内部NAATs)或外膜复合物B蛋白基因(omcB)的NAATs确定存在沙眼衣原体感染。omp1测序表明该变异株属于血清型I。PCR分析表明该变异株无质粒。该患者对单剂量阿奇霉素治疗无反应,但随后对多西环素疗程有反应。
鉴定出一种致病性无质粒沙眼衣原体变异株。临床医生应警惕由此类变异株引起的未检测到的沙眼衣原体感染的可能性,以及复发性衣原体性NGU患者中阿奇霉素治疗失败的可能性。这种变异株的出现很罕见,不应作为判断基于质粒的NAATs用于沙眼衣原体检测的性能或实用性的依据。