• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解监测:文本难度在叙事性文本和说明性文本元记忆中的作用。

Monitoring of comprehension: the role of text difficulty in metamemory for narrative and expository text.

作者信息

Weaver C A, Bryant D S

机构信息

Baylor University, Department of Psychology, Waco, TX 76798-9334.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 1995 Jan;23(1):12-22. doi: 10.3758/bf03210553.

DOI:10.3758/bf03210553
PMID:7885261
Abstract

The effect of text difficulty on metamemory for narrative and expository text was investigated. In Experiment 1, we found an interaction between type of text and type of question (thematic or detailed). For readers of narrative texts, correlations between predicted and actual performance were highest for detailed questions, but this pattern was reversed for readers of expository texts. Next, text difficulty was explored as a possible factor affecting metamemory accuracy. In Experiments 2 and 3, metamemory accuracy was a nonmonotonic function of text difficulty. Subjects made remarkably accurate predictions of future performance (mean G > .6) for both narrative and expository texts that were of intermediate difficulty (approximately a 12th-grade reading level). We propose an optimum effort hypothesis, predicting greatest metamemory accuracy when the texts are of intermediate difficulty.

摘要

研究了文本难度对记叙文和说明文元记忆的影响。在实验1中,我们发现文本类型和问题类型(主题性或细节性)之间存在交互作用。对于记叙文读者,细节性问题的预测表现与实际表现之间的相关性最高,但对于说明文读者,这种模式则相反。接下来,探讨了文本难度作为影响元记忆准确性的一个可能因素。在实验2和实验3中,元记忆准确性是文本难度的非单调函数。对于中等难度(大约十二年级阅读水平)的记叙文和说明文,受试者对未来表现做出了非常准确的预测(平均G>.6)。我们提出了一个最佳努力假设,预测当文本难度为中等时,元记忆准确性最高。

相似文献

1
Monitoring of comprehension: the role of text difficulty in metamemory for narrative and expository text.理解监测:文本难度在叙事性文本和说明性文本元记忆中的作用。
Mem Cognit. 1995 Jan;23(1):12-22. doi: 10.3758/bf03210553.
2
Processing and memory of information presented in narrative or expository texts.叙述性或说明性文本中信息的处理和记忆。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2010 Sep;80(Pt 3):341-62. doi: 10.1348/000709910X485700. Epub 2010 Feb 2.
3
The relationship between cognitive skills and reading comprehension of narrative and expository texts: A longitudinal study from Grade 1 to Grade 4.认知技能与记叙文和说明文阅读理解之间的关系:一项从一年级到四年级的纵向研究。
Learn Individ Differ. 2020 May;80. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101848. Epub 2020 May 18.
4
Levels of Reading Comprehension Across Text Types: A Comparison of Literal and Inferential Comprehension of Expository and Narrative Texts in Iranian EFL Learners.不同文本类型的阅读理解水平:伊朗英语学习者对说明文和记叙文的字面理解与推理理解的比较
J Psycholinguist Res. 2017 Oct;46(5):1087-1099. doi: 10.1007/s10936-017-9481-3.
5
Learning and memory of factual content from narrative and expository text.从叙述性和说明性文本中学习和记忆事实性内容。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2007 Sep;77(Pt 3):541-64. doi: 10.1348/000709906X143902.
6
Orienting tasks as moderators of narrative and expository text recall in adulthood.将定向任务作为成年人叙述性和说明性文本回忆的调节因素。
Psychol Aging. 1993 Mar;8(1):56-8. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.8.1.56.
7
Understanding abstract expository texts.理解摘要性说明文文本。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2002 Jun;72(Pt 2):279-97. doi: 10.1348/000709902158892.
8
Processing of expository and narrative texts by low- and high-comprehending children.低理解能力和高理解能力儿童对说明文和记叙文的处理。
Read Writ. 2018;31(9):2017-2040. doi: 10.1007/s11145-017-9789-2. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
9
Reading fluency and reading comprehension in Spanish secondary students.西班牙语中学生的阅读流畅度和阅读理解。
Psicothema. 2020 Feb;32(1):75-83. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2019.196.
10
Individual differences in working memory strategies for reading expository text.
Mem Cognit. 1995 Nov;23(6):735-48. doi: 10.3758/bf03200926.

引用本文的文献

1
Lack of effects of online HD-tDCS over the left or right DLPFC in an associative memory and metamemory monitoring task.在联想记忆和元记忆监测任务中,左或右背外侧前额叶皮质的线上 HD-tDCS 无影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 7;19(6):e0300779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300779. eCollection 2024.
2
Memory and comprehension of narrative versus expository texts: A meta-analysis.记忆与理解叙事性与说明性文本:元分析。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Jun;28(3):732-749. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01853-1. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
3
Levels of Reading Comprehension Across Text Types: A Comparison of Literal and Inferential Comprehension of Expository and Narrative Texts in Iranian EFL Learners.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions.当前知晓感预测准确性测量方法的比较。
Psychol Bull. 1984 Jan;95(1):109-33.
2
Metacomprehension of text material.文本材料的元理解。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1984 Oct;10(4):663-79. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.10.4.663.
3
Inexpert calibration of comprehension.理解能力的不专业校准。
不同文本类型的阅读理解水平:伊朗英语学习者对说明文和记叙文的字面理解与推理理解的比较
J Psycholinguist Res. 2017 Oct;46(5):1087-1099. doi: 10.1007/s10936-017-9481-3.
4
The negative cascade of incongruent generative study-test processing in memory and metacomprehension.记忆与元理解中不一致的生成性学习 - 测试加工的负向级联效应
Mem Cognit. 2007 Jun;35(4):668-78. doi: 10.3758/bf03193305.
5
Metacomprehension for educationally relevant materials: dramatic effects of encoding-retrieval interactions.与教育相关材料的元理解:编码-检索交互的显著影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Apr;14(2):212-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03194054.
6
Interruption-similarity effects during discourse processing.语篇处理过程中的中断相似性效应。
Memory. 2006 Oct;14(7):789-803. doi: 10.1080/09658210600679915.
7
Aging and self-regulated language processing.衰老与自我调节的语言处理
Psychol Bull. 2006 Jul;132(4):582-606. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.4.582.
8
The postdiction superiority effect in metacomprehension of text.
Mem Cognit. 2001 Jan;29(1):62-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03195741.
9
The rereading effect: metacomprehension accuracy improves across reading trials.
Mem Cognit. 2000 Sep;28(6):1004-10. doi: 10.3758/bf03209348.
10
Individual differences in metacognition: evidence against a general metacognitive ability.元认知的个体差异:反对一般元认知能力的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2000 Jan;28(1):92-107. doi: 10.3758/bf03211579.
Mem Cognit. 1987 Jan;15(1):84-93. doi: 10.3758/bf03197714.
4
Metamemory for narrative text.对叙事文本的元记忆。
Mem Cognit. 1987 Jan;15(1):72-83. doi: 10.3758/bf03197713.