• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Individual differences in working memory strategies for reading expository text.

作者信息

Budd D, Whitney P, Turley K J

机构信息

Washington State University, Pullman 99164-4820, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 1995 Nov;23(6):735-48. doi: 10.3758/bf03200926.

DOI:10.3758/bf03200926
PMID:8538446
Abstract

This study investigated whether individual differences in working memory (WM) span are associated with different WM management strategies during the reading of expository text. In Experiment 1, probe questions were presented on line during reading to determine whether thematic information was maintained in WM throughout comprehension. The data indicated that readers across the range of WM span maintained thematic information in WM throughout the reading of a given passage. In Experiment 2, sentence reading times and accuracy for both topic and detail questions were measured in two conditions: when topic sentences were present and when topic sentences were absent. Subjects performed similarly across the range of WM span in the topic-present condition, but lower span subjects performed more poorly on detail questions in the topic-absent condition. In Experiment 3, the topic-present condition of the second experiment was replicated, except that subjects expected to receive questions about details only. Thematic processing and retention of topic and detail information all increased with span. Taken together, these results suggest that, for more difficult text processing tasks, high- and low-span subjects adopt different WM management strategies and these strategies influence what is learned from reading the text.

摘要

相似文献

1
Individual differences in working memory strategies for reading expository text.
Mem Cognit. 1995 Nov;23(6):735-48. doi: 10.3758/bf03200926.
2
[Effects of macroprocessing skill on children's comprehension of expository text].[宏观加工技能对儿童说明文理解的影响]
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2011 Oct;82(4):354-61. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.82.354.
3
Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: a test of four hypotheses.工作记忆与理解能力的个体差异:四项假设的检验
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992 Sep;18(5):972-92. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.18.5.972.
4
Working memory and lexical ambiguity resolution as revealed by ERPs: a difficult case for activation theories.事件相关电位揭示的工作记忆与词汇歧义消解:激活理论面临的一个难题
J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Jul 1;15(5):643-57. doi: 10.1162/089892903322307366.
5
Monitoring of comprehension: the role of text difficulty in metamemory for narrative and expository text.理解监测:文本难度在叙事性文本和说明性文本元记忆中的作用。
Mem Cognit. 1995 Jan;23(1):12-22. doi: 10.3758/bf03210553.
6
Processing and memory of information presented in narrative or expository texts.叙述性或说明性文本中信息的处理和记忆。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2010 Sep;80(Pt 3):341-62. doi: 10.1348/000709910X485700. Epub 2010 Feb 2.
7
Individual differences in children's working memory and writing skill.儿童工作记忆与写作技能的个体差异。
J Exp Child Psychol. 1996 Nov;63(2):358-85. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1996.0054.
8
Working-memory capacity as long-term memory activation: an individual-differences approach.工作记忆容量作为长期记忆激活:一种个体差异研究方法。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993 Sep;19(5):1101-14. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.19.5.1101.
9
The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension.言语工作记忆容量的测量及其与阅读理解的关系。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1996 Feb;49(1):51-75. doi: 10.1080/713755607.
10
A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity.工作记忆容量的控制性注意观点。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Jun;130(2):169-83. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.130.2.169.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Written, Auditory, and Combined Modalities on Comprehension by People With Aphasia.书面、听觉和组合模态对失语症患者理解的影响。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Aug 9;28(3):1206-1221. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-0013. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
2
The impact of working memory and the "process of process modelling" on model quality: Investigating experienced versus inexperienced modellers.工作记忆和“过程建模过程”对模型质量的影响:经验丰富与经验不足的建模者调查。
Sci Rep. 2016 May 9;6:25561. doi: 10.1038/srep25561.
3
Classifying retrieval strategies as a function of working memory.

本文引用的文献

1
Monitoring changes in cognitive load during reading: an event-related brain potential and reaction time analysis.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993 Jan;19(1):51-69. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.19.1.51.
2
Topicalization effects in cued recall of technical prose.技术散文线索回忆中的主题化效应。
Mem Cognit. 1981 Nov;9(6):541-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03202348.
3
Coactivation and comprehension: contribution of text variables to the illusion of knowing.
Mem Cognit. 1984 Jul;12(4):355-60. doi: 10.3758/bf03198295.
4
根据工作记忆对检索策略进行分类。
Mem Cognit. 2012 Feb;40(2):218-30. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0149-1.
4
The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts.先验知识和文本结构对阅读科学文本过程中理解过程的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2007 Oct;35(7):1567-77. doi: 10.3758/bf03193491.
5
Reading strategies and prior knowledge in learning from hypertext.超文本学习中的阅读策略与先验知识
Mem Cognit. 2006 Jul;34(5):1157-71. doi: 10.3758/bf03193262.
6
Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind.工作记忆容量的个体差异与心智的双加工理论
Psychol Bull. 2004 Jul;130(4):553-73. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.553.
7
Working memory capacity and strategy use.工作记忆容量与策略运用。
Mem Cognit. 2001 Jan;29(1):10-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03195736.
Short-term storage and the processing of cohesion during reading.阅读过程中的短期存储与衔接处理
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1986 Aug;38(3):431-60. doi: 10.1080/14640748608401607.
5
The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model.知识在语篇理解中的作用:一种建构-整合模型。
Psychol Rev. 1988 Apr;95(2):163-82. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.163.
6
A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory.一种理解能力理论:工作记忆中的个体差异。
Psychol Rev. 1992 Jan;99(1):122-49. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.99.1.122.
7
Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity.工作记忆对句法歧义处理的限制。
Cogn Psychol. 1992 Jan;24(1):56-98. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90003-k.
8
Inference during reading.阅读过程中的推理。
Psychol Rev. 1992 Jul;99(3):440-66. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.99.3.440.
9
Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: a test of four hypotheses.工作记忆与理解能力的个体差异:四项假设的检验
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992 Sep;18(5):972-92. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.18.5.972.