• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

文本材料的元理解。

Metacomprehension of text material.

作者信息

Maki R H, Berry S L

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1984 Oct;10(4):663-79. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.10.4.663.

DOI:10.1037//0278-7393.10.4.663
PMID:6239006
Abstract

Subjects' abilities to predict future multiple-choice test performance after reading sections of text were investigated in two experiments. In Experiment 1, subjects who scored above median test performance showed some accuracy in their predictions of that test performance. They gave higher mean ratings to material related to correct than to incorrect test answers. Subjects who scored below median test performance did not show this prediction accuracy. The retention interval between reading and the test was manipulated in Experiment 2. Subjects who were tested after at least a 24-hr delay showed results identical to those of Experiment 1. However, when subjects were tested immediately after reading, subjects above and below median test performance gave accurate predictions for the first immediate test. In contrast, both types of subjects gave inaccurate predictions for the second immediate test. Structural variables, such as length, serial position, and hierarchical level of the sections of text were related to subjects' predictions. These variables, in general, were not related to test performance, although the predictions were related to test performance in the conditions described above.

摘要

在两项实验中,研究了受试者在阅读文本片段后预测未来多项选择题测试表现的能力。在实验1中,测试表现高于中位数的受试者在预测该测试表现时具有一定的准确性。他们对与正确测试答案相关的材料给出的平均评分高于与错误测试答案相关的材料。测试表现低于中位数的受试者则没有显示出这种预测准确性。在实验2中,对阅读与测试之间的保留间隔进行了操控。在至少延迟24小时后进行测试的受试者显示出与实验1相同的结果。然而,当受试者在阅读后立即进行测试时,测试表现高于和低于中位数的受试者对第一次即时测试都做出了准确的预测。相比之下,两种类型的受试者对第二次即时测试都做出了不准确的预测。文本片段的结构变量,如长度、序列位置和层次水平,与受试者的预测有关。总体而言,这些变量与测试表现无关,尽管在上述条件下预测与测试表现相关。

相似文献

1
Metacomprehension of text material.文本材料的元理解。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1984 Oct;10(4):663-79. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.10.4.663.
2
Monitoring of comprehension: the role of text difficulty in metamemory for narrative and expository text.理解监测:文本难度在叙事性文本和说明性文本元记忆中的作用。
Mem Cognit. 1995 Jan;23(1):12-22. doi: 10.3758/bf03210553.
3
Effects of thematic information on script memory in young and old adults.主题信息对年轻人和老年人脚本记忆的影响。
Psychol Aging. 1988 Sep;3(3):292-9. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.3.3.292.
4
Prediction accuracy of text recall: ease, effort and familiarity.文本回忆的预测准确性:轻松程度、努力程度和熟悉程度。
Scand J Psychol. 1994 Dec;35(4):367-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1994.tb00960.x.
5
Note taking, review, memory, and comprehension.笔记记录、复习、记忆与理解。
Am J Psychol. 2011 Spring;124(1):63-73. doi: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.124.1.0063.
6
The negative cascade of incongruent generative study-test processing in memory and metacomprehension.记忆与元理解中不一致的生成性学习 - 测试加工的负向级联效应
Mem Cognit. 2007 Jun;35(4):668-78. doi: 10.3758/bf03193305.
7
The rereading effect: metacomprehension accuracy improves across reading trials.
Mem Cognit. 2000 Sep;28(6):1004-10. doi: 10.3758/bf03209348.
8
Are performance predictions for text based on ease of processing?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Jan;28(1):69-80. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.28.1.69.
9
The JOIs of text comprehension: Supplementing retrieval practice to enhance inference performance.文本理解的联合推断指标:补充检索练习以提高推理性能。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2016 Mar;22(1):59-71. doi: 10.1037/xap0000066. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
10
Influences of metamemory on performance predictions for text.
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2002 Apr;55(2):505-24. doi: 10.1080/02724980143000352.

引用本文的文献

1
Benefits from sketching for improving comprehension monitoring from illustrated texts.通过素描提高对图文文本的理解监测的益处。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Sep 2. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02730-5.
2
Low-Performing Students Confidently Overpredict Their Grade Performance throughout the Semester.成绩较差的学生在整个学期中自信地过度预估自己的成绩表现。
J Intell. 2023 Sep 28;11(10):188. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11100188.
3
Negative emotion can be "more negative" for those with high metacognitive abilities when problem-solving.在解决问题时,消极情绪对于那些元认知能力较高的人来说可能会“更消极”。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 13;14:1110211. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1110211. eCollection 2023.
4
Metacognitive accuracy across cognitive and physical task domains.认知和身体任务领域的元认知准确性。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Aug;29(4):1524-1530. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02066-4. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
5
How Well Do You Think You Summarize? Metacomprehension Accuracy in Younger and Older Adults.你总结得如何?年轻人和老年人的元认知准确性。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Mar 14;76(4):732-740. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbz142.
6
Metacognitive Monitoring of Text Comprehension: An Investigation on Postdictive Judgments in Typically Developing Children and Children With Reading Comprehension Difficulties.文本理解的元认知监控:对正常发育儿童和阅读理解困难儿童的事后判断的调查
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 20;9:2253. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02253. eCollection 2018.
7
The Illusion of Knowing in Metacognitive Monitoring: Effects of the Type of Information and of Personal, Cognitive, Metacognitive, and Individual Psychological Characteristics.元认知监测中的知晓错觉:信息类型以及个人、认知、元认知和个体心理特征的影响
Eur J Psychol. 2018 Jun 19;14(2):317-341. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v14i2.1418. eCollection 2018 Jun.
8
How often are thoughts metacognitive? Findings from research on self-regulated learning, think-aloud protocols, and mind-wandering.元认知思维出现的频率是多少?自我调节学习、出声思维和思维漫游研究的发现。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Aug;25(4):1269-1286. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1490-1.
9
Metacognition and Reading: Comparing Three Forms of Metacognition in Normally Developing Readers and Readers with Dyslexia.元认知与阅读:比较正常发育读者和阅读障碍读者的三种元认知形式
Dyslexia. 2015 Aug;21(3):273-84. doi: 10.1002/dys.1501.
10
Metacognition and confidence: comparing math to other academic subjects.
Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 2;6:742. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00742. eCollection 2015.