• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受原假设。

Accepting the null hypothesis.

作者信息

Frick R W

机构信息

Department of Psychology, SUNY at Stony Brook 11794-2500.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 1995 Jan;23(1):132-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03210562.

DOI:10.3758/bf03210562
PMID:7885262
Abstract

This article concerns acceptance of the null hypothesis that one variable has no effect on another. Despite frequent opinions to the contrary, this null hypothesis can be correct in some situations. Appropriate criteria for accepting the null hypothesis are (1) that the null hypothesis is possible; (2) that the results are consistent with the null hypothesis; and (3) that the experiment was a good effort to find an effect. These criteria are consistent with the meta-rules for psychology. The good-effort criterion is subjective, which is somewhat undesirable, but the alternative--never accepting the null hypothesis--is neither desirable nor practical.

摘要

本文涉及对零假设的接受,即一个变量对另一个变量没有影响。尽管经常有相反的观点,但在某些情况下,这个零假设可能是正确的。接受零假设的适当标准是:(1)零假设是可能的;(2)结果与零假设一致;(3)该实验为发现影响做出了充分努力。这些标准与心理学的元规则一致。充分努力标准是主观的,这有点不理想,但另一种选择——从不接受零假设——既不理想也不实际。

相似文献

1
Accepting the null hypothesis.接受原假设。
Mem Cognit. 1995 Jan;23(1):132-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03210562.
2
Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis.用于接受和拒绝原假设的贝叶斯t检验。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Apr;16(2):225-37. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.225.
3
A model-averaging approach to replication: the case of p rep.复制的模型平均法:p rep 的案例。
Psychol Methods. 2010 Jun;15(2):172-81. doi: 10.1037/a0017182.
4
Null hypothesis significance testing: a review of an old and continuing controversy.零假设显著性检验:对一个古老且持续存在的争议的回顾
Psychol Methods. 2000 Jun;5(2):241-301. doi: 10.1037/1082-989x.5.2.241.
5
A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing.关于实用贝叶斯替代零假设检验的教程。
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Sep;43(3):679-90. doi: 10.3758/s13428-010-0049-5.
6
How to quantify support for and against the null hypothesis: a flexible WinBUGS implementation of a default Bayesian t test.如何量化对原假设的支持与反对:一种默认贝叶斯t检验的灵活WinBUGS实现方法
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Aug;16(4):752-60. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.4.752.
7
Killeen's (2005) p rep coefficient: logical and mathematical problems.基利恩(2005)的 p 值系数:逻辑和数学问题。
Psychol Methods. 2010 Jun;15(2):182-91. doi: 10.1037/a0016955.
8
The error of accepting the "theoretical" null hypothesis: the rise, fall, and resurrection of commonsense hypotheses in psychology.接受“理论性”零假设的错误:心理学中常识性假设的兴起、衰落与复兴。
Psychol Bull. 2001 May;127(3):408-23. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.408.
9
Effect sizes for experimenting psychologists.实验心理学家的效应量
Can J Exp Psychol. 2003 Sep;57(3):221-37. doi: 10.1037/h0087427.
10
Least sum of Euclidean regression residuals: estimation of effect size.欧几里得回归残差的最小和:效应大小的估计
Psychol Rep. 2002 Dec;91(3 Pt 1):955-62. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2002.91.3.955.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigation of Electrical Signals in the Brain of People with Autism Using Effective Connectivity Network.利用有效连接网络对自闭症患者大脑中的电信号进行研究。
J Med Signals Sens. 2024 Aug 6;14:24. doi: 10.4103/jmss.jmss_15_24. eCollection 2024.
2
Spoken Sentence Complexity and Grammar Use in Children with CIs.人工耳蜗植入儿童的口语句子复杂度和语法使用情况。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2023 Jun 20;28(3):280-287. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enac051.
3
Moral contamination: Perceptions of good (but not bad) deeds depend on the ethical history of the actor.

本文引用的文献

1
A power primer.强力底漆。
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155.
2
Testing the null hypothesis and the strategy and tactics of investigating theoretical models.检验零假设以及研究理论模型的策略与方法。
Psychol Rev. 1962 Jan;69:54-61. doi: 10.1037/h0038813.
3
Using significance tests to evaluate equivalence between two experimental groups.使用显著性检验评估两个实验组之间的等效性。
道德污染:对善举(而非恶行)的认知取决于行为者的道德历史。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 19;13:1025214. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1025214. eCollection 2022.
4
Decision neuroscience and neuroeconomics: Recent progress and ongoing challenges.决策神经科学与神经经济学:近期进展与现存挑战。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2022 May;13(3):e1589. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1589. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
5
Comparison of Expressive Spoken Language Skills in Children With Cochlear Implants and Children With Typical Hearing.人工耳蜗植入儿童与听力正常儿童的表达性口语技能比较
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 15;11:1405. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01405. eCollection 2020.
6
A Critical Analysis of Colour-Shape Correspondences: Examining the Replicability of Colour-Shape Associations.颜色-形状对应关系的批判性分析:检验颜色-形状关联的可重复性。
Iperception. 2019 Mar 29;10(2):2041669519834042. doi: 10.1177/2041669519834042. eCollection 2019 Mar-Apr.
7
Diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorder in Children with Low Mental Age.诊断低智力儿童的自闭症谱系障碍。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2019 Mar;49(3):1080-1095. doi: 10.1007/s10803-018-3810-8.
8
The behavioural phenotype of Potocki-Lupski syndrome: a cross-syndrome comparison.波托茨基-卢普斯基综合征的行为表型:跨综合征比较。
J Neurodev Disord. 2018 Jan 10;10(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s11689-017-9221-x.
9
Hamilton's inclusive fitness maintains heritable altruism polymorphism through = .汉密尔顿适合度通过 =. 维持可遗传的利他主义多态性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Feb 20;115(8):1860-1864. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1710215115. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
10
Eye Contact Judgment Is Influenced by Perceivers' Social Anxiety But Not by Their Affective State.目光接触判断受感知者社交焦虑的影响,但不受其情感状态的影响。
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 10;8:373. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00373. eCollection 2017.
Psychol Bull. 1993 May;113(3):553-65. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.113.3.553.
4
Memory for unattended events: remembering with and without awareness.对未注意事件的记忆:有意识与无意识的记忆。
Mem Cognit. 1984 Mar;12(2):105-11. doi: 10.3758/bf03198423.
5
The test of significance in psychological research.心理学研究中的显著性检验。
Psychol Bull. 1966 Dec;66(6):423-37. doi: 10.1037/h0020412.
6
Evidence and scientific research.证据与科学研究。
Am J Public Health. 1988 Dec;78(12):1568-74. doi: 10.2105/ajph.78.12.1568.
7
Symmetrical confidence intervals for bioequivalence trials.生物等效性试验的对称置信区间。
Biometrics. 1976 Dec;32(4):741-4.
8
Statistical aspects of comparative bioavailability trials.生物利用度比较试验的统计学方面
Biometrics. 1979 Mar;35(1):273-80.