Müller H J, Heller D, Ziegler J
Birkbeck College, University of London, England.
Percept Psychophys. 1995 Jan;57(1):1-17. doi: 10.3758/bf03211845.
Three experiments investigated visual search for singleton feature targets. The critical dimension on which the target differed from the nontargets was either known in advance or unknown--that is, the critical difference varied either within a dimension or across dimensions. Previous work (Treisman, 1988) had shown that, while the search reaction time (RT) functions were flat in both conditions, there was an intercept cost for the cross-dimension condition. Experiment 1 examined whether this cost would disappear when responses could be based on the detection of any (target-nontarget) difference in the display (by requiring a "heterogeneity/homogeneity" decision). The cost remained. This argues that pop-out requires (or involves) knowledge of the particular dimension in which an odd-one-out target differs from the nontargets; furthermore, that knowledge is acquired through the elimination of dimensions not containing a target. In Experiment 2, the subjects had to eliminate (or ignore) one potential source of difference in order to give a positive response (displays could contain a "noncritical" difference requiring a negative response). The result was a comparatively large cost in the within-dimension (positive) condition. This can be taken to indicate that pop-out as such does not make available information as to the particular feature value in which the target differs from the nontargets. Experiment 3 examined whether search priorities can be biased in accordance with advance knowledge of the likely source of difference. The subjects were found to have a high degree of top-down control over what particular dimension to assign priority of checking to. The implication of the results for models of visual search and selection are discussed.
三项实验研究了对单一特征目标的视觉搜索。目标与非目标在关键维度上的差异要么是事先已知的,要么是未知的——也就是说,关键差异要么在一个维度内变化,要么跨维度变化。先前的研究(特雷斯曼,1988年)表明,虽然在这两种情况下搜索反应时间(RT)函数都是平缓的,但跨维度条件存在截距成本。实验1检验了在反应可以基于对显示中任何(目标 - 非目标)差异的检测时(通过要求做出“异质性/同质性”判断),这种成本是否会消失。成本依然存在。这表明突出显示需要(或涉及)知晓那个与众不同的目标与非目标不同的特定维度;此外,这种知晓是通过排除不包含目标的维度而获得的。在实验2中,受试者必须排除(或忽略)一个潜在的差异来源才能做出肯定反应(显示可能包含一个需要否定反应的“非关键”差异)。结果是在维度内(肯定)条件下出现了相对较大的成本。这可以被视为表明突出显示本身并不能提供关于目标与非目标不同的特定特征值的信息。实验3检验了搜索优先级是否可以根据对可能差异来源的预先了解而产生偏差。结果发现受试者对将检查优先级分配到哪个特定维度具有高度的自上而下的控制权。讨论了这些结果对视觉搜索和选择模型的意义。