Moertel C G, Mittelman J A, Bakemeier R F, Engstrom P, Hanley J
Cancer. 1976 Aug;38(2):678-82. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197608)38:2<678::aid-cncr2820380209>3.0.co;2-s.
One hundred and forty-six previously untreated patients with advanced gastric cancer were assigned at random to therapy with the following regimens: 1) Methyl CCNU alone; 2) Methyl CCNU with cyclophosphamide induction; 3) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) + methyl CCNU; and 4) 5-FU + methyl CCNU with cyclophosphamide induction. Cyclophosphamide induction produced an objective response rate of only 8%. In addition, it added to hematologic toxicity and detracted from the therapeutic activity of subsequent treatment. Methyl CCNU was relatively ineffective therapy with an overall objective response rate of 8%. The response rate to 5-FU + methyl CCNU without cyclophosphamide induction was 40% and this was significantly superior to all other regimens. The survival time of all patients treated with 5-FU + methyl CCNU was significantly superior to that of all patients treated with methyl CCNU alone.
146例先前未经治疗的晚期胃癌患者被随机分配接受以下治疗方案:1)单用甲环亚硝脲;2)甲环亚硝脲联合环磷酰胺诱导治疗;3)5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)+甲环亚硝脲;4)5-FU+甲环亚硝脲联合环磷酰胺诱导治疗。环磷酰胺诱导治疗的客观缓解率仅为8%。此外,它增加了血液学毒性,并降低了后续治疗的疗效。甲环亚硝脲作为治疗方法相对无效,总体客观缓解率为8%。不进行环磷酰胺诱导的5-FU+甲环亚硝脲治疗的缓解率为40%,显著优于所有其他方案。所有接受5-FU+甲环亚硝脲治疗的患者的生存时间显著优于所有单用甲环亚硝脲治疗的患者。