Ke R W, Dockter M E, Majumdar G, Buster J E, Carson S A
University of Tennessee, Memphis.
Fertil Steril. 1995 Apr;63(4):902-6.
Immunobead testing (IBT), the current standard for antisperm antibody detection, is time consuming and somewhat subjective. To overcome these limitations and maintain accuracy, we studied an immunofluorescent assay using flow cytometry.
A validation study comparing flow cytometry to IBT in the detection of serum antisperm antibodies.
Flow cytometry laboratory.
Sera from 37 men after vasectomy (test) and sera from 35 fertile men (control).
Test serum with and without immunoglobulin (Ig)G, IgA, and IgM antisperm antibodies as defined by IBT were analyzed by flow cytometry. Sensitivity and specificity of flow cytometry was calculated by defining the IBT as the true result.
Flow cytometry identified 22 of 22 sera that were IgG positive (100% sensitivity), 12 of 14 sera that were IgA positive (86% sensitivity), and 4 of 4 sera that were IgM positive (100% sensitivity). Overall, 22 of 37 men were positive for antisperm antibodies. The flow cytometry correctly identified 71 of 71 negative sera (100% specificity). Fluorescence intensity values from the 37 study patients significantly correlated with immunobead binding to the head region and to the entire (more than one) region.
Detection of IgG, IgA, and IgM antisperm antibodies by flow cytometry is highly sensitive and specific. In addition, flow cytometry is able to assess thousands of sperm rapidly and accurately, reducing sampling error and technical time.
免疫珠试验(IBT)是目前抗精子抗体检测的标准方法,但耗时且主观性较强。为克服这些局限性并保持准确性,我们研究了一种采用流式细胞术的免疫荧光测定法。
一项在血清抗精子抗体检测中对比流式细胞术与IBT的验证性研究。
流式细胞术实验室。
37例输精管结扎术后男性的血清(试验组)和35例生育期男性的血清(对照组)。
对经IBT定义为含有和不含有免疫球蛋白(Ig)G、IgA及IgM抗精子抗体的试验血清进行流式细胞术分析。将IBT定义为真实结果,计算流式细胞术的敏感性和特异性。
流式细胞术鉴定出22份IgG阳性血清中的22份(敏感性100%)、14份IgA阳性血清中的12份(敏感性86%)以及4份IgM阳性血清中的4份(敏感性100%)。总体而言,37例男性中有22例抗精子抗体呈阳性。流式细胞术正确鉴定出71份阴性血清中的71份(特异性100%)。37例研究患者的荧光强度值与免疫珠对头区及整个(不止一个)区域的结合显著相关。
通过流式细胞术检测IgG、IgA和IgM抗精子抗体具有高度敏感性和特异性。此外,流式细胞术能够快速、准确地评估数千个精子,减少抽样误差和技术操作时间。