• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭结构、居住流动性与辍学:一篇研究简报

Family structure, residential mobility, and school dropout: a research note.

作者信息

Astone N M, McLanahan S S

机构信息

Department of Population Dynamics, Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205.

出版信息

Demography. 1994 Nov;31(4):575-84.

PMID:7890092
Abstract

This paper examines the hypothesis that high levels of residential mobility among nonintact families account for part of the well-known association between living in a nonintact family and dropping out of high school. Children from single-parent families and stepfamilies are more likely than children from two-parent families to move during the school year. As much as 30% of the difference in the risk of dropping out between children from stepfamilies and children from intact families can be explained by differences in residential mobility. Previously, mechanisms explaining school failure on the part of children in nonintact families were more plausible for children in single-parent families than for children in stepfamilies; high levels of residential mobility apply to both groups of children. In addition, residential mobility lends itself to manipulation by public policy, with potentially remedial effects for vulnerable children.

摘要

本文检验了这样一种假设,即非完整家庭中较高的居住流动性是造成生活在非完整家庭与高中辍学之间众所周知的关联的部分原因。单亲家庭和再婚家庭的孩子比双亲家庭的孩子在学年期间更有可能搬家。再婚家庭孩子与完整家庭孩子在辍学风险上高达30%的差异可以用居住流动性的差异来解释。以前,解释非完整家庭中孩子学业失败的机制对单亲家庭的孩子比对再婚家庭的孩子更具合理性;高居住流动性适用于这两组孩子。此外,居住流动性便于公共政策进行调控,可能对弱势儿童产生补救作用。

相似文献

1
Family structure, residential mobility, and school dropout: a research note.家庭结构、居住流动性与辍学:一篇研究简报
Demography. 1994 Nov;31(4):575-84.
2
Does residential mobility improve educational outcomes? Evidence from the Netherlands.居住流动性是否能改善教育成果?来自荷兰的证据。
Soc Sci Res. 2015 Jul;52:351-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.02.008. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
3
Sibling effects, environmental influences, and university attendance: a follow-up study.兄弟姐妹的影响、环境因素与大学入学情况:一项追踪研究。
Psychol Rep. 2004 Dec;95(3 Pt 2):1267-70. doi: 10.2466/pr0.95.3f.1267-1270.
4
Influence of cannabis use trajectories, grade repetition and family background on the school-dropout rate at the age of 17 years in France.法国 17 岁辍学率受大麻使用轨迹、年级留级和家庭背景的影响。
Eur J Public Health. 2010 Apr;20(2):157-63. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp148. Epub 2009 Oct 5.
5
Dropping out of medical school in the UK: explaining the changes over ten years.英国医学院校辍学情况:解读十年间的变化
Med Educ. 2007 Apr;41(4):385-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2007.02710.x.
6
Residential mobility during adolescence: Do even "upward" moves predict dropout risk?青少年时期的居住流动性:即使是“向上”的迁移也会预示辍学风险吗?
Soc Sci Res. 2015 Sep;53:218-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.05.004. Epub 2015 May 16.
7
Simplicity and complexity in the effects of parental structure on high school graduation.家庭结构对高中毕业生影响中的简单性与复杂性
Demography. 1993 Nov;30(4):701-17.
8
Socioeconomic differences in school dropout among young adults: the role of social relations.青年成年人辍学情况中的社会经济差异:社会关系的作用。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Oct 15;15:1054. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2391-0.
9
Family structure, socioeconomic status, and access to health care for children.家庭结构、社会经济地位与儿童获得医疗保健服务的情况。
Health Serv Res. 2002 Feb;37(1):173-86.
10
School motivation and high school dropout: the mediating role of educational expectation.学校激励与高中辍学:教育期望的中介作用。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2014 Mar;84(Pt 1):22-39. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12002. Epub 2012 Oct 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Disparate Effects of Disruptive Events on Children.破坏性事件对儿童的不同影响。
RSF. 2024 Jan;10(1):1-30. doi: 10.7758/rsf.2024.10.1.01.
2
Internal Migration: Understanding Parent-Child Differences in Educational Expectations.国内人口迁移:理解亲子在教育期望上的差异
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2024;43. doi: 10.1007/s11113-024-09863-w. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
3
Parenting with nutrition education and unconditional cash reduce maternal depressive symptoms and improve quality of life: findings from a cluster randomised controlled trial in urban Bangladesh.

本文引用的文献

1
Reflections on "Family Structure and Child Well-Being: Economic Resources vs. Parental Socialization".关于《家庭结构与儿童福祉:经济资源与父母社会化》的思考
Soc Forces. 2012 Sep;91(1):45-53. doi: 10.1093/sf/sos119.
2
Simplicity and complexity in the effects of parental structure on high school graduation.家庭结构对高中毕业生影响中的简单性与复杂性
Demography. 1993 Nov;30(4):701-17.
3
Child support and welfare dependence: a multinomial logit analysis.子女抚养费与福利依赖:多项逻辑回归分析
通过营养教育和无条件现金补助进行育儿可减少产妇抑郁症状并提高生活质量:来自孟加拉国城市的一项集群随机对照试验的结果。
Glob Health Action. 2024 Dec 31;17(1):2426784. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2024.2426784. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
4
Informing disaster-risk management policies for education infrastructure using scenario-based recovery analyses.利用基于情景的恢复分析为教育基础设施的灾害风险管理政策提供信息。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jan 5;15(1):325. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42407-y.
5
Cohort Profile: High School and Beyond.队列简介:高中及以后。
Int J Epidemiol. 2022 Oct 13;51(5):e276-e284. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyac044.
6
Lasting effects of residential mobility during childhood on psychopathology among Chinese University students.儿童期居住流动性对中国大学生精神病理学的持久影响。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 15;21(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-03018-9.
7
Barring progress: The influence of paternal incarceration on families' neighborhood attainment.除进展之外:父亲入狱对家庭获得邻里环境的影响。
Soc Sci Res. 2019 Nov;84:102321. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.06.012. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
8
Residential Mobility Among Elementary School Students in Los Angeles County and Early School Experiences: Opportunities for Early Intervention to Prevent Absenteeism and Academic Failure.洛杉矶县小学生的居住流动性与早期学校经历:早期干预预防旷课和学业失败的机会
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 10;10:2176. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02176. eCollection 2019.
9
Estimating Children's Household Instability Between Birth and Age 18 Using Longitudinal Household Roster Data.使用纵向家庭名册数据估计儿童从出生到 18 岁期间的家庭不稳定情况。
Demography. 2019 Oct;56(5):1957-1973. doi: 10.1007/s13524-019-00806-1.
10
Do Children Carry the Weight of Divorce?孩子会承受离婚的重担吗?
Demography. 2019 Jun;56(3):785-811. doi: 10.1007/s13524-019-00784-4.
Demography. 1985 Aug;22(3):367-80.
4
Educational attainment of children from single-parent families: differences by exposure, gender, and race.单亲家庭儿童的教育程度:受暴露因素、性别和种族影响的差异
Demography. 1988 May;25(2):221-34.
5
Childhood events and circumstances influencing high school completion.影响高中完成情况的童年事件及环境
Demography. 1991 Feb;28(1):133-57.