Wolters G, Kuijpers L, Kacaki J, Schuurs A
J Clin Pathol. 1976 Oct;29(10):873-9. doi: 10.1136/jcp.29.10.873.
The preliminary results of a solid-phase enzyme-immunoassay (EIA) for the detection of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) are presented. This method has been compared with the solid-phase radioimmunoassay (RIA) for HBsAg in dilution series of four HBsAg positive sera four national reference panels (The Laboratory Panel of the Central Laboratory of the Blood Transfusion Service of the Netherlands Red Cross, USA BOB Reference Panels Nos 2 and 3, and the 1st Panel of the National Reference Centre for virus Hepatitis at the Institute of Hygiene of the University of Göttingen, West Germany). In addition, the two test methods were compared in a weekly (up to 16 weeks) follow-up of 14 patients with acute viral hepatitis B. It was seen that, both by reading EIA test results with the naked eye and by colorimetric reading, the sensitivity and specificity of this test method compared very favourably with those of the RIA. EIA may have a slightly lower sensitivity than RIA for the subtype ad, while its sensitivity for the subtype ay may be slightly higher than that of RIA. These minor sensitivity differences may be due to the specificity profiles of the antisera used.
本文介绍了一种用于检测乙型肝炎表面抗原(HBsAg)的固相酶免疫测定(EIA)的初步结果。该方法已与固相放射免疫测定(RIA)针对四份HBsAg阳性血清稀释系列以及四个国家参考品组(荷兰红十字会输血服务中心中央实验室的实验室参考品组、美国BOB参考品组2和3以及西德哥廷根大学卫生研究所病毒性肝炎国家参考中心的第1参考品组)中的HBsAg进行了比较。此外,还对两种检测方法在14例急性乙型病毒性肝炎患者的每周(长达16周)随访中进行了比较。结果发现,无论是通过肉眼读取EIA检测结果还是通过比色法读取,该检测方法的敏感性和特异性与RIA相比都非常有利。对于ad亚型,EIA的敏感性可能略低于RIA,而对于ay亚型,其敏感性可能略高于RIA。这些微小的敏感性差异可能归因于所使用抗血清的特异性谱。