棉拭子与藻酸盐拭子采样方法在肉鸡细菌学检查中的比较
Comparison of cotton swab versus algiante swab sampling method in the bacteriological examination of broiler chickens.
作者信息
Notermans S, Hindle V, Kampelmacher E H
出版信息
J Hyg (Lond). 1976 Oct;77(2):205-10. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400024633.
Abstract
Comparison of bacterial counts of poultry carcass skin by the cotton swab and alginate swab methods showed no differences between the two sampling methods in total counts and Enterobacteriaceae counts. Also no differences were found in Salmonella isolations.
摘要
通过棉拭子和藻酸盐拭子方法对家禽胴体皮肤细菌计数的比较表明，两种采样方法在总计数和肠杆菌科计数方面没有差异。沙门氏菌分离方面也未发现差异。
相似文献
1
Comparison of cotton swab versus algiante swab sampling method in the bacteriological examination of broiler chickens.棉拭子与藻酸盐拭子采样方法在肉鸡细菌学检查中的比较
J Hyg (Lond). 1976 Oct;77(2):205-10. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400024633.
2
Swab and excised tissue sampling for total and Enterobacteriaceae counts of fresh and surface-frozen broiler skin.用于新鲜和表面冷冻的肉鸡皮肤的总菌数和肠杆菌科菌数计数的拭子和切除组织采样。
Poult Sci. 1976 Nov;55(6):2405-8. doi: 10.3382/ps.0552405.
3
Predictive value of multiple drag-swab sampling for the detection of Salmonella from occupied or vacant poultry houses.多次拖拭采样对检测在用或空置禽舍中沙门氏菌的预测价值。
Avian Dis. 1994 Jul-Sep;38(3):461-6.
4
Usefulness of indicator bacteria as potential marker of Campylobacter contamination in broiler carcasses.指示菌作为肉鸡胴体中弯曲杆菌污染潜在标志物的有用性。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2018 Jul 2;276:63-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.04.003. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
5
Comparative evaluation of the Desoxycholate Agar Nissui Food Stamp and swab methods for estimating coliform organisms in poultry processing plants after cleaning in Japan.日本家禽加工厂清洁后，对用于估计大肠菌群的日水食品标签去氧胆酸盐琼脂和拭子法的比较评估。
J Basic Microbiol. 2004;44(6):445-50. doi: 10.1002/jobm.200410454.
6
[The use of neck skin for microbial process control of fresh poultry meat using the bioluminescence method].[利用颈部皮肤通过生物发光法对新鲜禽肉进行微生物过程控制]
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2004 May;111(5):181-4.
7
Studies on the estimation of the hygienic condition of frozen broiler chickens.冷冻肉鸡卫生状况评估的研究
J Hyg (Lond). 1976 Feb;76(1):57-63. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400054942.
8
A comparison of swab and maceration methods for bacterial sampling of pig carcasses.猪胴体细菌采样的拭子法与浸渍法比较。
J Hyg (Lond). 1985 Oct;95(2):383-90. doi: 10.1017/s002217240006280x.
9
A rapid colorimetric immunoassay for the detection of pathogenic bacteria on poultry processing plants using cotton swabs and nanobeads.一种使用棉签和纳米珠的快速比色免疫分析方法，用于检测家禽加工厂中的致病菌。
Mikrochim Acta. 2018 Feb 10;185(3):164. doi: 10.1007/s00604-018-2696-7.
10
Monitoring poultry farms for Salmonella by drag-swab sampling and antigen-capture immunoassay.通过拖拭采样和抗原捕获免疫测定法监测家禽养殖场中的沙门氏菌。
Avian Dis. 1989 Oct-Dec;33(4):684-90.
引用本文的文献
1
Methods for recovering microorganisms from solid surfaces used in the food industry: a review of the literature.从食品工业用固体表面回收微生物的方法：文献综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Nov 14;10(11):6169-83. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10116169.
本文引用的文献
1
Variability in microbiological samplings of chickens by the swab method.通过拭子法对鸡进行微生物采样的变异性。
Poult Sci. 1966 Mar;45(2):233-6. doi: 10.3382/ps.0450233.
2
Quantifying bacteria on poultry carcass skin.对家禽胴体皮肤表面的细菌进行定量分析。
Poult Sci. 1970 Sep;49(5):1309-15. doi: 10.3382/ps.0491309.
3
Microbiological sampling of poultry carcasses.家禽屠体的微生物采样。
J Appl Bacteriol. 1972 Dec;35(4):569-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1972.tb03738.x.
4
Attachment of some bacterial strains to the skin of broiler chickens.
Br Poult Sci. 1974 Nov;15(6):573-85. doi: 10.1080/00071667408416148.
Zotero 插件