Zutshi D, Mason M
Scand J Rheumatol Suppl. 1976;1976(0):77-84.
Four studies on ketoprofen [2-(3 Benzoylphenyl) propionic acid, 19583 R.P., Orudis, Profenid N.D.] have been carried out to establish whether it is well tolerated and effective in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Firstly a comprehensive open clinical and biological monitoring study was undertakin in 11 patients who received ketoprofen for an average period of 20 months without any serious or persistent adverse clinical reaction or adverse change in standard laboratory investigations. The second study involved the same patients who were also included in an ophthalmic screening study for drug toxicity. This established that no eye abnormalities attributable to ketoprofen occurred during this period of treatment. These tolerance studies were then followed by two comparative double-blind cross-over trials of ketoprofen in 117 patients with "definite" rheumatoid arthritis. One of them confirmed the significantly superior analgesic effect compared with placebo and showed that the incidence of adverse reactions was similar. The other trial showed that comparing ketoprofen 150 mg daily and indomethacin 100 mg daily the clinical effects of the two drugs were the same in 8 out of 10 indices. Only in severity of pain and rescue drug count was there a significant difference favouring indomethacin. Adverse reactions were more frequent with indomethacin despite prior exclusion from the study of patients known to be intolerant of indomethacin. It was concluded that on this evidence ketoprofen is a clinically active and well tolerated drug which should be valuable in the management of rheumatoid arthritis.
已开展了四项关于酮洛芬[2-(3-苯甲酰基苯基)丙酸,19583 R.P.,奥鲁地,洛芬待因,新药]的研究,以确定其在类风湿性关节炎患者治疗中是否耐受性良好且有效。首先,对11名患者进行了一项全面的开放临床和生物学监测研究,这些患者接受酮洛芬治疗的平均时长为20个月,期间未出现任何严重或持续的临床不良反应,标准实验室检查也未出现不良变化。第二项研究涉及同样这些患者,他们还被纳入了一项药物毒性的眼科筛查研究。这证实了在该治疗期间未出现可归因于酮洛芬的眼部异常。这些耐受性研究之后是两项针对117名“确诊”类风湿性关节炎患者的酮洛芬对比双盲交叉试验。其中一项试验证实,与安慰剂相比,酮洛芬的镇痛效果显著更优,且不良反应发生率相似。另一项试验表明,每日服用150毫克酮洛芬与每日服用100毫克吲哚美辛相比,在10项指标中有8项两者的临床效果相同。仅在疼痛严重程度和急救药物使用次数方面,吲哚美辛有显著优势。尽管事先已将已知对吲哚美辛不耐受的患者排除在研究之外,但吲哚美辛的不良反应仍更为频繁。得出的结论是,基于这些证据,酮洛芬是一种临床活性良好且耐受性良好的药物,在类风湿性关节炎的治疗中应具有重要价值。