Wong K, Henderson I C
Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California San Francisco 94143-1270.
World J Surg. 1994 Jan-Feb;18(1):98-111. doi: 10.1007/BF00348199.
Systemic treatment almost certainly prolongs the median survival of women with metastatic breast cancer, and it may prolong the survival of a small number of patients substantially. Even with conventional therapy, 10% or more patients may live into the second decade after recurrence. However, the disease cannot be eradicated, and the primary goal of treatment remains palliation and improvement of the quality of life. Because of the great variability in the pattern and course of the disease from one patient to another, therapy should be selected judiciously to maximize response and minimize toxicity. In some clinical situations, such as pathologic fractures and brain metastases, local therapies alone, such as surgery or irradiation, are the treatments of choice. Patients who will respond to endocrine therapy are well defined, and all patients with the characteristics of an endocrine responder deserve a chance at palliation with this modality alone because of its limited toxicity. A number of new forms of endocrine therapy with more specific targets at estrogen and progesterone receptor sites are now in clinical trials. When used appropriately, chemotherapy significantly improves patient quality of life despite its toxicity. No drug combinations, schedules, or doses have been shown to prolong survival or provide better net palliation than classic CMF (oral cyclophosphamide with intravenous methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) or CAF (intravenous cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and 5-fluorouracil). Treatment with these combinations in excess of 6 to 9 months provides only marginal additional benefits and no survival advantage. The role of high dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation remains a promising area of investigation, but the available survival data are entirely compatible with the possibility that this modality will eventually prove inferior to conventional therapy. Many new cytotoxic agents with unique mechanisms of action are currently under investigation, including taxol, taxotere, Topotecan, and amonafide. Taxol may be the most promising therapy now available for patients whose disease has become refractory to doxorubicin. Biologic therapies using monoclonal antibodies against a specific oncogene or its product have entered clinical trials, and novel drug delivery systems using liposomes are under evaluation.
全身治疗几乎肯定能延长转移性乳腺癌女性患者的中位生存期,并且可能显著延长少数患者的生存期。即便采用传统疗法,10%或更多的患者在复发后仍可能存活至第二个十年。然而,该病无法根除,治疗的主要目标仍是缓解症状并改善生活质量。由于患者之间疾病模式和病程差异极大,应谨慎选择治疗方法,以实现最大疗效并将毒性降至最低。在某些临床情况中,如病理性骨折和脑转移,单独的局部治疗,如手术或放疗,是首选治疗方法。对内分泌治疗有反应的患者已明确界定,所有具有内分泌反应者特征的患者都应仅通过这种方式获得缓解的机会,因为其毒性有限。目前有多种针对雌激素和孕激素受体位点的更具特异性靶点的新型内分泌治疗方法正在进行临床试验。化疗在合理使用时,尽管有毒性,但能显著改善患者生活质量。尚无任何药物组合、方案或剂量被证明比经典的CMF(口服环磷酰胺联合静脉注射甲氨蝶呤和5-氟尿嘧啶)或CAF(静脉注射环磷酰胺、多柔比星和5-氟尿嘧啶)更能延长生存期或提供更好的总体缓解效果。使用这些组合治疗超过6至9个月仅能带来微小的额外益处,且无生存优势。高剂量化疗联合自体骨髓移植的作用仍是一个有前景的研究领域,但现有的生存数据完全符合这种治疗方式最终可能被证明不如传统疗法的可能性。目前正在研究许多具有独特作用机制的新型细胞毒性药物,包括紫杉醇、多西他赛、拓扑替康和氨苯吖啶。紫杉醇可能是目前对多柔比星耐药的患者最有前景的治疗方法。使用针对特定癌基因或其产物的单克隆抗体的生物疗法已进入临床试验,使用脂质体的新型药物递送系统也在评估之中。