Clarke K W, Gray D, Keating N A, Hampton J R
University Hospital, Nottingham.
BMJ. 1994 Sep 3;309(6954):563-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6954.563.
To determine whether women with acute myocardial infarction in the Nottingham health district receive the same therapeutic interventions as their male counterparts.
Retrospective study.
University and City Hospitals, Nottingham.
All patients admitted with a suspected myocardial infarction during 1989 and 1990.
Route and timing of admission to hospital, ward of admission, treatment, interventions in hospital, and mortality.
Women with myocardial infarction took longer to arrive in hospital than men. They were less likely to be admitted to the coronary care unit and were therefore also less likely to receive thrombolytic treatment. They seemed to have more severe infarcts, with higher Killip classes, and had a slightly higher mortality during admission. They were less likely than men to receive secondary prophylaxis by being discharged taking beta blockers or aspirin.
Survival chances both in hospital and after discharge in women with acute myocardial infarction are reduced because they do not have the same opportunity for therapeutic intervention as men.
确定诺丁汉健康区急性心肌梗死女性患者接受的治疗干预措施是否与其男性 counterparts 相同。
回顾性研究。
诺丁汉大学医院和城市医院。
1989年和1990年期间所有因疑似心肌梗死入院的患者。
入院途径和时间、入院病房、治疗、住院期间的干预措施以及死亡率。
心肌梗死女性患者到达医院的时间比男性更长。她们入住冠心病监护病房的可能性较小,因此接受溶栓治疗的可能性也较小。她们似乎梗死更严重,Killip分级更高,住院期间死亡率略高。与男性相比,她们出院时服用β受体阻滞剂或阿司匹林进行二级预防的可能性较小。
急性心肌梗死女性患者在住院期间和出院后的生存机会降低,因为她们没有与男性相同的治疗干预机会。