De Lena S M, Gende O A, Almirón M A, Cingolani H E
Centro de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, La Plata, Argentina.
Can J Cardiol. 1994 Sep;10(7):753-60.
To determine prevalence of diastolic arterial hypertension (DAH) in young individuals using different criteria. Secondly, to test the possible different blood pressure reactions to mental stress and hand grip in two groups: group A, a 'low blood pressure group', and group B, diastolic blood pressure 90 mmHg or greater in one interview and below these values in a second interview.
A total of 1423 volunteer medical students was recruited at La Plata School of Medicine, average age 21 +/- 3 years.
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were measured three times on two different occasions separated by one week. With the values obtained, prevalence of arterial hypertension was determined according to the criteria suggested by The Joint National Committee 4 (JNC-4) and the World Health Organization (WHO), and to statistical bases.
Mental stress and hand grip tests were performed by groups A and B.
The prevalence of DAH when only the first determination of the first interview was considered was 14.7%, 6.7% (considering the WHO criterion) or 5% (using the statistical criterion). These values are reduced if repeated measurements are averaged. The greatest reduction was obtained when the JNC-4 criterion was used (1.6%). The reactivity of stressors did not show any relationship with the initial blood pressure of the subjects.
In epidemiological studies, the differences among the criteria should be considered when analyzing blood pressure of populations. Stress tests (mental stress and hand grip) do not help in identifying differences between the groups studied.
使用不同标准确定年轻人群中舒张期动脉高血压(DAH)的患病率。其次,测试两组人群对精神压力和握力可能存在的不同血压反应:A组为“低血压组”,B组在一次访谈中舒张压≥90 mmHg,而在另一次访谈中低于这些值。
在拉普拉塔医学院共招募了1423名志愿医学生,平均年龄21±3岁。
在相隔一周的两个不同时间点,对收缩压和舒张压进行三次测量。根据美国国家联合委员会第4版(JNC - 4)和世界卫生组织(WHO)建议的标准以及统计学依据,确定动脉高血压的患病率。
A组和B组进行精神压力和握力测试。
仅考虑首次访谈的首次测量结果时,DAH的患病率为14.7%,(按照WHO标准)为6.7%,(使用统计学标准)为5%。如果对重复测量结果取平均值,这些数值会降低。使用JNC - 4标准时降低幅度最大(1.6%)。应激源的反应性与受试者的初始血压没有任何关系。
在流行病学研究中,分析人群血压时应考虑不同标准之间的差异。压力测试(精神压力和握力)无助于识别所研究组之间的差异。