Earnest D L, Holubec H, Wali R K, Jolley C S, Bissonette M, Bhattacharyya A K, Roy H, Khare S, Brasitus T A
Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson 85721.
Cancer Res. 1994 Oct 1;54(19):5071-4.
The present studies were conducted at the Universities of Chicago and Arizona to examine and compare the effects of supplemental dietary ursodeoxycholic acid to cholic acid, a known tumor promoter, and to piroxicam, a known chemopreventive agent, in the azoxymethane (AOM) model of experimental colonic carcinogenesis. Male Fischer 344 rats were utilized in these experiments. All animals were fed a basal diet (AIN-76) supplemented with 0.2% or 0.4% cholic acid, 0.2% or 0.4% ursodeoxycholic acid, 0.2% ursodeoxycholic acid plus 0.2% cholic acid, or 75 ppm piroxicam. Rats were given s.c. injections once a week for 2 weeks with AOM (15 mg/kg body wt/week) or vehicle (saline) after being fed their respective diets for 2 weeks. The rats in each group were then maintained on their respective diets for approximately 28 weeks; after sacrifice, their colons were removed and examined macroscopically and microscopically for the presence of tumors. The results of these studies demonstrated that none of the control rats fed the various diets injected with AOM-vehicle developed tumors. In groups receiving AOM, the addition of cholic acid (0.4%) caused a significant increase in the incidence of tumors. In contrast, the addition of 0.2% ursodeoxycholic acid did not promote AOM-induced colonic tumors, and when it was added to a promoting dose of cholic acid (0.2%), 0.2% ursodeoxycholic acid prevented enhancement of tumor promotion. At higher doses (0.4%), supplemental dietary ursodeoxycholic acid significantly reduced the incidence of colon tumors and cancers. Moreover, the tumor suppressive effects of 0.4% ursodeoxycholic acid exceeded that of dietary piroxicam. Our results further emphasize the important role of bile salts in modulating colonic tumor development. These studies also demonstrate for the first time that supplemental dietary ursodeoxycholic acid is a chemopreventive agent in the AOM model of experimental colonic carcinogenesis.
本研究在芝加哥大学和亚利桑那大学进行,目的是在偶氮甲烷(AOM)诱导的实验性结肠癌发生模型中,检验并比较补充膳食熊去氧胆酸与已知的肿瘤促进剂胆酸以及已知的化学预防剂吡罗昔康的效果。这些实验使用了雄性Fischer 344大鼠。所有动物均喂食添加了0.2%或0.4%胆酸、0.2%或0.4%熊去氧胆酸、0.2%熊去氧胆酸加0.2%胆酸或75 ppm吡罗昔康的基础饲料(AIN - 76)。在给予各自饲料2周后,大鼠每周皮下注射一次AOM(15 mg/kg体重/周)或溶剂(生理盐水),共注射2周。然后每组大鼠继续食用各自的饲料约28周;处死后,取出它们的结肠,进行宏观和微观检查以确定是否存在肿瘤。这些研究结果表明,喂食各种饲料并注射AOM - 溶剂的对照大鼠均未发生肿瘤。在接受AOM的组中,添加胆酸(0.4%)导致肿瘤发生率显著增加。相比之下,添加0.2%熊去氧胆酸并未促进AOM诱导的结肠肿瘤,并且当将其添加到促癌剂量的胆酸(0.2%)中时,0.2%熊去氧胆酸可防止肿瘤促进作用增强。在较高剂量(0.4%)时,补充膳食熊去氧胆酸可显著降低结肠肿瘤和癌症的发生率。此外,0.4%熊去氧胆酸的肿瘤抑制作用超过了膳食吡罗昔康。我们的结果进一步强调了胆盐在调节结肠肿瘤发生中的重要作用。这些研究还首次证明,补充膳食熊去氧胆酸在AOM诱导的实验性结肠癌发生模型中是一种化学预防剂。