• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卫生经济研究中收集的医疗资源单位的估值。

Valuation of medical resource units collected in health economic studies.

作者信息

Copley-Merriman C, Lair T J

机构信息

Health Economics Research-Decision Sciences Division, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 1994 May-Jun;16(3):553-68.

PMID:7923320
Abstract

This paper reviews the issues that are critical for the valuation of medical resources in the context of health economic studies. There are several points to consider when undertaking the valuation of medical resources. The perspective of the analysis should be established before determining the valuation process. Future costs should be discounted to present values, and time and effort spent in assigning a monetary value to a medical resource should be proportional to its importance in the analysis. Prices vary considerably based on location of the service and the severity of the illness episode. Because of the wide variability in pricing data, sensitivity analysis is an important component of validation of study results. A variety of data sources have been applied to the valuation of medical resources. Several types of data are reviewed in this paper, including claims data, national survey data, administrative data, and marketing research data. Valuation of medical resources collected in clinical trials is complex because of the lack of standardization of the data sources. A national pricing data source for health economic valuation would greatly facilitate study analysis and make comparisons between results more meaningful.

摘要

本文回顾了在健康经济研究背景下对医疗资源估值至关重要的问题。在对医疗资源进行估值时,有几点需要考虑。在确定估值过程之前,应确立分析的视角。未来成本应折算为现值,并且为医疗资源赋予货币价值所花费的时间和精力应与其在分析中的重要性成正比。价格会因服务地点和疾病发作的严重程度而有很大差异。由于定价数据的广泛变异性,敏感性分析是验证研究结果的重要组成部分。多种数据来源已被应用于医疗资源的估值。本文回顾了几种类型的数据,包括理赔数据、全国调查数据、行政数据和市场研究数据。由于数据源缺乏标准化,对临床试验中收集到医疗资源进行估值很复杂。用于健康经济估值的国家定价数据源将极大地促进研究分析,并使结果之间的比较更有意义。

相似文献

1
Valuation of medical resource units collected in health economic studies.卫生经济研究中收集的医疗资源单位的估值。
Clin Ther. 1994 May-Jun;16(3):553-68.
2
[Computerization and the importance of information in health system, as in health care resources registry].[计算机化以及信息在卫生系统中的重要性,如在医疗保健资源登记方面]
Acta Med Croatica. 2005;59(3):251-7.
3
Health economics in public health.公共卫生中的卫生经济学
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Mar;36(3):273-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.11.005.
4
Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health.质量调整生命年在儿科护理中缺乏质量:对已发表的儿童健康成本效用研究的批判性综述。
Pediatrics. 2005 May;115(5):e600-14. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2127.
5
[Empirical standard costs for health economic evaluation in Germany -- a proposal by the working group methods in health economic evaluation].[德国卫生经济评价的经验性标准成本——卫生经济评价方法工作组的一项提议]
Gesundheitswesen. 2005 Oct;67(10):736-46. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-858698.
6
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.美国国家癌症研究所全爱尔兰癌症会议。
Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277.
7
Cost valuation in resource-poor settings.资源匮乏地区的成本估值。
Health Policy Plan. 2005 Jul;20(4):252-9. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czi025.
8
Administrative and claims records as sources of health care cost data.作为医疗保健成本数据来源的行政和理赔记录。
Med Care. 2009 Jul;47(7 Suppl 1):S51-5. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819c95aa.
9
Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. In 2007.2007年美国糖尿病的经济成本。
Diabetes Care. 2008 Mar;31(3):596-615. doi: 10.2337/dc08-9017.
10
Using willingness to pay to measure family members' preferences in mental health.运用支付意愿来衡量家庭成员在心理健康方面的偏好。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2005 Jun;8(2):71-81.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of cost construction based on either DRG or ICD-9 codes or risk group stratification on the resulting cost-effectiveness ratios.基于疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)或国际疾病分类第九版(ICD - 9)编码或风险组分层的成本构建对所得成本效益比的影响。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(18):1209-16. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422180-00005.
2
A critical review of published economic modelling studies in depression.对已发表的抑郁症经济模型研究的批判性综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Jun;17(6):555-83. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200017060-00003.
3
Pharmacoeconomic analysis of stress ulcer prophylaxis for critically ill patients.
危重症患者应激性溃疡预防的药物经济学分析
Pharmacoeconomics. 1996 May;9(5):455-65. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199609050-00008.
4
A strategy for collecting pharmacoeconomic data during phase II/III clinical trials.一种在II/III期临床试验期间收集药物经济学数据的策略。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1996 Mar;9(3):264-77. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199609030-00007.