Van Reijsen F C, Wijburg O L, Gebhardt M, Van Ieperen-Van Dijk A G, Betz S, Poellabauer E M, Thepen T, Bruijnzeel-Koomen C A, Mudde G C
Department of Dermatology/Allergology, University Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Clin Exp Immunol. 1994 Oct;98(1):151-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.1994.tb06622.x.
We previously reported the isolation of allergen-specific Th2 lines and clones from atopy patch test (APT) sites of atopic dermatitis (AD) patients. Upon stimulation with allergen or anti-CD3+ phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) IL-4 was released with or without IL-5, while no (or extremely low concentrations of) IL-2 and interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) were detectable. A high IL-4/IFN-gamma ratio facilitates production of allergen-specific IgE, of which high levels are observed in AD patients. Here we show that the above mentioned Th2 cells are notably different from murine Th2 cells. Not IL-4, which is the autocrine acting growth factor for murine Th2 cells, but IL-2 was needed for proliferation of these human APT-derived Th2 lines and clones. Of significance, unless exogenous IL-2 was added, no proliferative response to allergen, presented by Epstein-Barr virus-transformed B (EBV-B) cells, non-T cells or IgE-bearing Langerhans cells (LC), occurred. Lack of proliferation and IL-2 production after full T cell receptor (TCR) triggering is a characteristic first described for in vitro anergized T cells. However, like the clones we describe in this study, anergic T cells may retain production of cytokines other than IL-2. A further resemblance between anergic T cells and the human Th2 clones reported here is that IL-4 can enhance IL-2-driven proliferation, but is not capable of inducing T cell growth by itself. The absence of IL-4-driven proliferation differentiates human Th2 cells from murine Th2 cells. Both produce IL-4 when stimulated in a cognate fashion, but only murine Th2 cells will proliferate. We conclude that the presently reported human Th2 cells are different from murine Th2 cells, in that they need other T cells to produce IL-2 required for their expansion. Moreover, the Th2 cells phenotypically resemble anergic T cells. As yet, however, we have no clue as to whether these features account for the current Th2 cells only or for human Th2 cells in general. We hypothesize that the Th2 phenotype of AD skin-derived, allergen-specific T cells may be induced in vivo by LC, which lack CD80, and therefore do not provide secondary signals through CD28-CD80 interaction.
我们之前报道过从特应性皮炎(AD)患者的特应性斑贴试验(APT)部位分离出变应原特异性Th2细胞系和克隆。在用变应原或抗CD3 +佛波酯肉豆蔻酸酯(PMA)刺激后,IL-4会在有或没有IL-5的情况下释放,而未检测到(或仅检测到极低浓度的)IL-2和干扰素-γ(IFN-γ)。高IL-4/IFN-γ比值有利于变应原特异性IgE的产生,而在AD患者中观察到高水平的变应原特异性IgE。在此我们表明,上述Th2细胞与小鼠Th2细胞显著不同。这些源自人APT的Th2细胞系和克隆的增殖需要的不是作为小鼠Th2细胞自分泌生长因子的IL-4,而是IL-2。重要的是,除非添加外源性IL-2,否则对由爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒转化的B(EBV-B)细胞、非T细胞或携带IgE的朗格汉斯细胞(LC)呈递的变应原不会发生增殖反应。完全触发T细胞受体(TCR)后缺乏增殖和IL-2产生是体外无反应性T细胞首次被描述的特征。然而,与我们在本研究中描述的克隆一样,无反应性T细胞可能保留除IL-2之外的细胞因子产生能力。无反应性T细胞与本文报道的人Th2克隆之间的另一个相似之处是,IL-4可以增强IL-2驱动的增殖,但自身不能诱导T细胞生长。缺乏IL-4驱动的增殖使人Th2细胞与小鼠Th2细胞区分开来。两者在同源刺激下均产生IL-4,但只有小鼠Th2细胞会增殖。我们得出结论,目前报道的人Th2细胞与小鼠Th2细胞不同,因为它们需要其他T细胞来产生其扩增所需的IL-2。此外,这些Th2细胞在表型上类似于无反应性T细胞。然而,目前我们尚不清楚这些特征是仅针对当前的Th2细胞还是普遍针对人Th2细胞。我们推测,AD皮肤来源的变应原特异性T细胞的Th2表型可能在体内由缺乏CD80、因此不能通过CD28 - CD80相互作用提供第二信号的LC诱导产生。