Suppr超能文献

持续跨肺压在治疗透明膜病方面是否优于传统呼吸管理?一项对照研究。

Is continuous transpulmonary pressure better than conventional respiratory management of hyaline membrane disease? A controlled study.

作者信息

Belenky D A, Orr R J, Woodrum D E, Hodson W A

出版信息

Pediatrics. 1976 Dec;58(6):800-8.

PMID:792789
Abstract

The influence of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on mortality and complication rates in severe hyaline membrane disease (HMD) was evaluated in a randomized, prospective study. Patients were admitted to the study if the Po2 was less than 50 mm Hg with FiO2 greater than 0.6. Twenty-four patients in each of three weight groups were equally divided between treatment and control groups. The treatment regimen included CPAP (6 to 14 cm H2O) for spontaneously breathing patients and PEEP for patients requiring mechanical ventilation for apnea or hypercapnia (Pco2 greater than 65 mm Hg). Control patients received oxygen and were mechanically ventilated if they had apnea, hypercapnia, or Po2 less than 50 mm Hg with FiO2 greater than 0.8. Oxygenation improved after the start of CPAP or PEEP; however, Pco2 rose after CPAP was initiated. There was no significant difference between treatment and control groups in mortality, requirement for mechanical ventilation, or incidence of pulmonary sequelae. The incidence of pulmonary air-leak was increased with Peep. the findings suggest that CPAP and PEEP have not significantly altered the outcome of HMD.

摘要

在一项随机前瞻性研究中,评估了持续气道正压通气(CPAP)和呼气末正压通气(PEEP)对严重透明膜病(HMD)死亡率和并发症发生率的影响。如果患者在吸入氧浓度(FiO2)大于0.6时动脉血氧分压(Po2)低于50 mmHg,则纳入该研究。三个体重组中的每组24例患者被平均分为治疗组和对照组。治疗方案包括对自主呼吸患者采用CPAP(6至14 cm H2O),对因呼吸暂停或高碳酸血症(动脉血二氧化碳分压[Pco2]大于65 mmHg)而需要机械通气的患者采用PEEP。对照组患者接受氧气治疗,若出现呼吸暂停、高碳酸血症或在FiO2大于0.8时Po2低于50 mmHg,则进行机械通气。开始CPAP或PEEP治疗后氧合情况有所改善;然而,开始CPAP治疗后Pco2升高。治疗组和对照组在死亡率、机械通气需求或肺部后遗症发生率方面无显著差异。PEEP会增加肺漏气的发生率。研究结果表明,CPAP和PEEP并未显著改变HMD的预后。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验