Abu-Saad H H, Pool H, Tulkens B
Department of Nursing Science, University of Limburg, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J Adv Nurs. 1994 Jun;19(6):1063-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01189.x.
This paper reports on the results of two studies conducted to further validate the Abu-Saad Paediatric Pain Assessment Tool, a Dutch-language questionnaire developed to assess pain in school-age children. Children of 5 to 15 years of age reported in the first study their post-operative pain before and after the administration of analgesic medication using word descriptors of pain, the 10-cm scale, the Oucher, and a visual analogue scale (VAS). Lower mean pain scores at 4-hourly intervals post-analgesia supported the construct validity of the tool. Convergent validity was supported in both studies when scores on all concurrently administered measures positively correlated with the pain tool. In the second study, the correlations between pain and fear, a concurrently used measure with the pain instruments, were low, substantiating the discriminant validity of the pain tool. The significance of the results in relation to instrument development and multidimensional pain assessment in children are further discussed and elaborated.
本文报告了两项研究的结果,这两项研究旨在进一步验证阿布-萨阿德儿童疼痛评估工具,该工具是一种为评估学龄儿童疼痛而开发的荷兰语问卷。在第一项研究中,5至15岁的儿童使用疼痛的文字描述、10厘米量表、奥ucher量表和视觉模拟量表(VAS)报告了他们在服用镇痛药物前后的术后疼痛情况。镇痛后每4小时的平均疼痛评分较低,支持了该工具的结构效度。当所有同时使用的测量方法的分数与疼痛工具呈正相关时,两项研究均支持了收敛效度。在第二项研究中,疼痛与恐惧(一种与疼痛工具同时使用的测量方法)之间的相关性较低,证实了疼痛工具的区分效度。文中进一步讨论并阐述了这些结果在儿童仪器开发和多维疼痛评估方面的意义。