• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面部、腿部、活动、哭闹、安抚性观察工具作为评估认知障碍儿童疼痛程度的可靠性和有效性。

The reliability and validity of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability observational tool as a measure of pain in children with cognitive impairment.

作者信息

Voepel-Lewis Terri, Merkel Sandy, Tait Alan R, Trzcinka Agnieszka, Malviya Shobha

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Section of Pediatrics, C. S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0211, USA.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2002 Nov;95(5):1224-9, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200211000-00020.

DOI:10.1097/00000539-200211000-00020
PMID:12401598
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Pain assessment remains difficult in children with cognitive impairment (CI). In this study, we evaluated the validity and reliability of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) tool for assessing pain in children with CI. Each child's developmental level and ability to self-report pain were evaluated. The child's nurse observed and scored pain with the FLACC tool before and after analgesic administration. Simultaneously, parents scored pain with a visual analog scale, and scores were obtained from children who were able to self-report pain. Observations were videotaped and later viewed by nurses blinded to analgesics and pain scores. One-hundred-forty observations were recorded from 79 children. FLACC scores correlated with parent scores (P < 0.001) and decreased after analgesics (P = 0.001), suggesting good validity. Correlations of total scores (r = 0.5-0.8; P < 0.001) and of each category (r = 0.3-0.8; P < 0.001), as well as measures of exact agreement (kappa = 0.2-0.65), suggest good reliability. Test-retest reliability was supported by excellent correlations (r = 0.8-0.883; P < 0.001) and categorical agreement (r = 0.617-0.935; kappa = 0.400-0.881; P < 0.001). These data suggest that the FLACC tool may be useful as an objective measure of postoperative pain in children with CI.

IMPLICATIONS

The FLACC pain assessment tool may facilitate reliable and valid observational pain assessment in children with cognitive impairment who cannot self-report their pain. Objective pain assessment is important to facilitate effective postoperative pain management in these vulnerable children.

摘要

未标注

对于认知障碍(CI)儿童,疼痛评估仍然困难。在本研究中,我们评估了面部、腿部、活动、哭闹、可安慰性(FLACC)工具在评估CI儿童疼痛方面的有效性和可靠性。评估了每个儿童的发育水平和自我报告疼痛的能力。儿童的护士在给予镇痛药前后使用FLACC工具观察并对疼痛进行评分。同时,家长使用视觉模拟量表对疼痛进行评分,对于能够自我报告疼痛的儿童也获取其评分。观察过程进行录像,之后由对镇痛药和疼痛评分不知情的护士观看。从79名儿童中记录了140次观察结果。FLACC评分与家长评分相关(P < 0.001),且在给予镇痛药后降低(P = 0.001),表明有效性良好。总分相关性(r = 0.5 - 0.8;P < 0.001)以及各分类相关性(r = 0.3 - 0.8;P < 0.001),还有精确一致性测量(kappa = 0.2 - 0.65),表明可靠性良好。重测信度得到了出色相关性(r = 0.8 - 0.883;P < 0.001)和分类一致性(r = 0.617 - 0.935;kappa = 0.400 - 0.881;P < 0.001)的支持。这些数据表明,FLACC工具可能作为评估CI儿童术后疼痛的客观指标有用。

启示

FLACC疼痛评估工具可能有助于对无法自我报告疼痛的认知障碍儿童进行可靠且有效的观察性疼痛评估。客观的疼痛评估对于促进这些脆弱儿童的有效术后疼痛管理很重要。

相似文献

1
The reliability and validity of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability observational tool as a measure of pain in children with cognitive impairment.面部、腿部、活动、哭闹、安抚性观察工具作为评估认知障碍儿童疼痛程度的可靠性和有效性。
Anesth Analg. 2002 Nov;95(5):1224-9, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200211000-00020.
2
The revised FLACC observational pain tool: improved reliability and validity for pain assessment in children with cognitive impairment.修订后的FLACC观察性疼痛工具:提高了对认知障碍儿童疼痛评估的可靠性和有效性。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2006 Mar;16(3):258-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2005.01773.x.
3
Validity of parent ratings as proxy measures of pain in children with cognitive impairment.家长评分作为认知障碍儿童疼痛替代指标的有效性。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2005 Dec;6(4):168-74. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2005.08.004.
4
A comparison of the clinical utility of pain assessment tools for children with cognitive impairment.认知障碍儿童疼痛评估工具的临床效用比较。
Anesth Analg. 2008 Jan;106(1):72-8, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000287680.21212.d0.
5
Reliability and validity of the face, legs, activity, cry, consolability behavioral tool in assessing acute pain in critically ill patients.面部、腿部、活动、哭声、可安抚性行为工具评估危重症患者急性疼痛的可靠性和有效性。
Am J Crit Care. 2010 Jan;19(1):55-61; quiz 62. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2010624.
6
Verifying the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Behavioral Scale.验证面部、腿部、活动、哭泣、安抚(FLACC)行为量表日文版的有效性和可靠性。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 13;13(3):e0194094. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194094. eCollection 2018.
7
FLACC Behavioral Pain Assessment Scale: a comparison with the child's self-report.FLACC行为疼痛评估量表:与儿童自我报告的比较。
Pediatr Nurs. 2003 May-Jun;29(3):195-8.
8
The FLACC behavioral scale for procedural pain assessment in children aged 5-16 years.用于5至16岁儿童程序性疼痛评估的FLACC行为量表。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Aug;18(8):767-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02655.x.
9
Self-report of pain in young people and adults with spastic cerebral palsy: interrater reliability of the revised Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (r-FLACC) scale ratings.痉挛型脑瘫青少年和成人的自我报告疼痛:修订后的面部、腿部、活动、哭泣和安慰(r-FLACC)量表评分的评定者间信度。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019 Jan;61(1):69-74. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13980. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
10
Validation of the COMFORT Behavior scale and the FLACC scale for pain assessment in Chinese children after cardiac surgery.COMFORT行为量表和FLACC量表在中国儿童心脏手术后疼痛评估中的有效性验证。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2012 Mar;13(1):18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2010.07.002. Epub 2011 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of delirium in Indonesian pediatric intensive care unit: a psychometric evaluation of the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium.印度尼西亚儿科重症监护病房中谵妄的评估:康奈尔儿科谵妄评估量表的心理测量学评价
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Jan 24;184(2):153. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-05984-2.
2
Family participatory clown therapy in venipuncture in hospitalized children: A non-randomized controlled trial.家庭参与式小丑疗法在住院儿童静脉穿刺中的应用:一项非随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 25;19(7):e0305101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305101. eCollection 2024.
3
Postoperative evaluation of special needs and healthy patients with endodontic treatment under general anesthesia: a retrospective research.
全麻下根管治疗术的特殊需要和健康患者的术后评估:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jul 14;24(1):794. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04584-0.
4
Comparative Evaluation of New Needleless Local Anesthetic System (INJEX) and Conventional Syringe Needle Technique during Pulpotomy Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.牙髓切断术治疗中新型无针局部麻醉系统(INJEX)与传统注射器针头技术的比较评估:一项随机临床试验
Children (Basel). 2024 Apr 25;11(5):514. doi: 10.3390/children11050514.
5
Pain assessment, cognitive and cortical changes with full mouth rehabilitation in a group of children.全口修复治疗对一组儿童的疼痛评估、认知和皮质变化。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 May 23;24(1):599. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04356-w.
6
Single-dose Intraoperative Methadone for Pain Management in Pediatric Tonsillectomy: A Randomized Double-blind Clinical Trial.单次术中给予吗啡用于小儿扁桃体切除术的疼痛管理:一项随机双盲临床试验。
Anesthesiology. 2024 Sep 1;141(3):463-474. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005031.
7
Children Intoxicated with Psychoactive Substances: The Health Status on Admission to Hospital Based on Medical Records.精神活性物质中毒儿童:基于病历的入院时健康状况
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 20;13(6):1771. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061771.
8
[Application effects of nitrous oxide and oxygen mixed inhalation technology on analgesia and sedation during debridement and dressing change in children with moderate or severe burns].[氧化亚氮与氧气混合吸入技术在中重度烧伤患儿清创换药时镇痛镇静中的应用效果]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi. 2023 Mar 20;39(3):248-255. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220308-00051.
9
Cerebral palsy pain instruments: Recommended tools for clinical research studies by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Cerebral Palsy Common Data Elements project.脑瘫疼痛评估工具:美国国立神经疾病与中风研究所脑瘫通用数据元素项目推荐用于临床研究的工具。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2024 May;66(5):610-622. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.15743. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
10
The Pharmacological Treatment of Neuropathic Pain in Children.儿童神经病理性疼痛的药物治疗。
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2024;22(1):38-52. doi: 10.2174/1570159X21666230804110858.