• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A meta-analysis of fluoxetine outcome in the treatment of depression.

作者信息

Greenberg R P, Bornstein R F, Zborowski M J, Fisher S, Greenberg M D

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, State University of New York Health Science Center at Syracuse 13210.

出版信息

J Nerv Ment Dis. 1994 Oct;182(10):547-51. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199410000-00003.

DOI:10.1097/00005053-199410000-00003
PMID:7931201
Abstract

A meta-analysis was conducted on all the double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy trials of the antidepressant fluoxetine (Prozac). This drug has become the antidepressant most frequently prescribed by psychiatrists and has been hailed by the media as a "wonder drug." Results produced a relatively modest overall effect size that was no greater than effect sizes obtained by previous meta-analyses of tricyclic antidepressants. This study also examined the possibility that bias may have contaminated study outcome ratings. Because past studies suggest that the greater frequency of side effects in active drug groups unblinds study participants, we examined the relationship between study effect sizes and the percentage of patients reporting side effects. As predicted, both clinician and patient outcome ratings correlated significantly with the percentage of patients experiencing side effects. Questions are raised about the role of side effects in mediating drug outcome results.

摘要

相似文献

1
A meta-analysis of fluoxetine outcome in the treatment of depression.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1994 Oct;182(10):547-51. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199410000-00003.
2
Fluoxetine and suicide: a meta-analysis of controlled trials of treatment for depression.氟西汀与自杀:抑郁症治疗对照试验的荟萃分析
BMJ. 1991 Sep 21;303(6804):685-92. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6804.685.
3
A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of fluoxetine in children and adolescents with depression.一项针对患有抑郁症的儿童和青少年的氟西汀双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997 Nov;54(11):1031-7. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830230069010.
4
Fluoxetine, placebo, and tricyclic antidepressants in major depression with and without anxious features.氟西汀、安慰剂及三环类抗抑郁药治疗伴有或不伴有焦虑症状的重度抑郁症
J Clin Psychiatry. 1994 Feb;55(2):50-9.
5
Effect of pindolol in hastening response to fluoxetine in the treatment of major depression: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.吲哚洛尔在加速氟西汀治疗重度抑郁症反应中的作用:一项双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Am J Psychiatry. 1997 Jan;154(1):37-43. doi: 10.1176/ajp.154.1.37.
6
A controlled trial of fluoxetine in nondepressed patients with Huntington's disease.
Mov Disord. 1997 May;12(3):397-401. doi: 10.1002/mds.870120319.
7
Pattern analysis of antidepressant response to fluoxetine.氟西汀抗抑郁反应的模式分析
J Clin Psychiatry. 1986 Nov;47(11):560-2.
8
A review of multicenter controlled studies of fluoxetine vs. imipramine and placebo in outpatients with major depressive disorder.对氟西汀与丙咪嗪及安慰剂治疗重度抑郁症门诊患者的多中心对照研究的综述。
J Clin Psychiatry. 1985 Mar;46(3 Pt 2):53-8.
9
"Wish bias" in antidepressant drug trials?抗抑郁药物试验中的“愿望偏差”?
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2004 Apr;24(2):126-30. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000115665.45074.0d.
10
Fluoxetine in depressed alcoholics. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.氟西汀治疗抑郁的酗酒者。一项双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997 Aug;54(8):700-5. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830200024004.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence for various interventions to reduce depressive symptoms for children and adolescents: protocol of a global evidence and gap map.减少儿童和青少年抑郁症状的各种干预措施的证据:全球证据与差距地图方案
Syst Rev. 2025 Aug 8;14(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s13643-025-02909-w.
2
Magnitude of placebo response in clinical trials of paroxetine for vasomotor symptoms: a meta-analysis.帕罗西汀治疗血管舒缩症状临床试验中安慰剂反应的程度:一项荟萃分析。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Aug 4;14:1204163. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1204163. eCollection 2023.
3
PROTOCOL: Treatment for depressive disorder among adults: An evidence and gap map of systematic reviews.
方案:成人抑郁症的治疗:系统评价的证据与差距图
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 5;19(1):e1308. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1308. eCollection 2023 Mar.
4
Impact of active placebo controls on estimated drug effects in randomised trials: a systematic review of trials with both active placebo and standard placebo.活性安慰剂对照对随机试验中估计药物效应的影响:既有活性安慰剂又有标准安慰剂的试验的系统评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 6;3(3):MR000055. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000055.pub2.
5
Socially transmitted placebo effects.社会传递的安慰剂效应。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Dec;3(12):1295-1305. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0749-5. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
6
Placebo Effect in the Treatment of Depression and Anxiety.安慰剂效应在抑郁症和焦虑症治疗中的作用
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 13;10:407. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00407. eCollection 2019.
7
Is the efficacy of antidepressants in panic disorder mediated by adverse events? A mediational analysis.抗抑郁药在惊恐障碍中的疗效是由不良事件介导的吗?一项中介分析。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 2;12(6):e0178617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178617. eCollection 2017.
8
Is the Efficacy of Antidepressants Truly a Myth?抗抑郁药的疗效真的是个神话吗?
Glob Adv Health Med. 2012 Nov;1(5):12-3. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2012.1.5.003. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
9
Lessons learned from placebo groups in antidepressant trials.抗抑郁药试验中安慰剂组的经验教训。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Jun 27;366(1572):1879-88. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0394.
10
Personality change during depression treatment: a placebo-controlled trial.抑郁症治疗期间的人格变化:一项安慰剂对照试验。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009 Dec;66(12):1322-30. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.166.