Sharpley C F
Centre for Stress Management and Research, Faculty of Education-SGS, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
J Behav Med. 1994 Jun;17(3):309-29. doi: 10.1007/BF01857955.
The maintenance over time (4 months) and generalizability (to a work setting) of laboratory-based heart rate reactivity control training was investigated. Forty-three subjects received 5 weeks of biofeedback, imagery, and breathing training and 41 subjects acted as controls. Although there were no significant differences between the reactivities of the control and those of the treatment subjects at any of three pretraining tests, significant differences were noted immediately following training, 7 weeks, and 4 months later, showing maintenance effects. Data collected during work activities on the frequency of reactivity of a magnitude similar to that in the laboratory also showed that treatment subjects had significantly fewer incidents of reactivity than control subjects after training. Followup interviews with treatment subjects indicated that lifestyles were also enhanced in a variety of areas, suggesting that the training had wider benefits. Issues for further research are discussed.
研究了基于实验室的心率反应控制训练在一段时间内(4个月)的维持情况以及对工作环境的可推广性。43名受试者接受了为期5周的生物反馈、意象和呼吸训练,41名受试者作为对照组。尽管在三项训练前测试中的任何一项中,对照组和治疗组受试者的反应性均无显著差异,但在训练后、7周和4个月后立即观察到显著差异,显示出维持效应。在工作活动期间收集的数据表明,与实验室中类似程度的反应频率方面,训练后治疗组受试者的反应事件明显少于对照组受试者。对治疗组受试者的后续访谈表明,生活方式在多个方面也得到了改善,这表明该训练有更广泛的益处。还讨论了进一步研究的问题。