• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

马来酸噻吗洛尔与左布诺洛尔的比较。每5毫升瓶装的使用时长。

A comparison of timolol maleate and levobunolol. Length of use per 5-ml bottle.

作者信息

Meyer M A, Savitt M L

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Loyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois.

出版信息

Ophthalmology. 1994 Oct;101(10):1658-61. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31119-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31119-5
PMID:7936563
Abstract

PURPOSE

The authors analyzed the actual length of use of commercially available 5-ml bottles of 0.5% timolol maleate (Timoptic) and 0.5% levobunolol (Betagan) among patients who routinely use topical beta-blockers (1 drop twice daily in both eyes) for glaucoma treatment.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to receive two 5-ml bottles of either timolol or levobunolol in a double-blind fashion. The patients used the drops independently and the bottles in sequence. The dates were recorded when each of the two 5-ml bottles were used. Sixty patients were enrolled, 15 were excluded from the study, and the data from the remaining 45 were analyzed.

RESULTS

There was a 21% greater length of use per 5-ml bottle among patients who were randomized to 0.5% timolol maleate (36.6 +/- 10.4 days) compared with 0.5% levobunolol (28.9 +/- 8.1 days) (P = 0.009). The length of use of the first bottle versus the second bottle was compared and was found not to be significantly different in either group. There was no statistical difference in intraocular pressure control among patients before and after the study.

CONCLUSION

There is a markedly greater length of use of the 5-ml bottle of timolol compared with the 5-ml bottle of levobunolol. The difference is believed to be due to the configuration of the levobunolol's bottle tip and the vehicle used to deliver the drug. The data may be extrapolated to a substantial patient savings and should be considered in prescription recommendations.

摘要

目的

作者分析了青光眼患者中,常规使用局部β受体阻滞剂(双眼每日两次,每次一滴)进行治疗时,市售5毫升瓶装0.5%马来酸噻吗洛尔(噻吗心安)和0.5%左布诺洛尔(贝他根)的实际使用时长。

方法

患者被随机双盲接受两瓶5毫升的噻吗洛尔或左布诺洛尔。患者独立使用滴眼液,并按顺序使用药瓶。记录两瓶5毫升药瓶各自使用的日期。共招募60名患者,15名被排除在研究之外,对其余45名患者的数据进行分析。

结果

随机接受0.5%马来酸噻吗洛尔的患者,每5毫升药瓶的使用时长(36.6±10.4天)比接受0.5%左布诺洛尔的患者(28.9±8.1天)长21%(P = 0.009)。比较了第一瓶和第二瓶的使用时长,发现两组均无显著差异。研究前后患者的眼压控制无统计学差异。

结论

5毫升瓶装的噻吗洛尔使用时长明显长于5毫升瓶装的左布诺洛尔。这种差异被认为是由于左布诺洛尔药瓶尖端的构造以及用于给药的赋形剂所致。这些数据可外推至可观的患者节省费用情况,在处方建议中应予以考虑。

相似文献

1
A comparison of timolol maleate and levobunolol. Length of use per 5-ml bottle.马来酸噻吗洛尔与左布诺洛尔的比较。每5毫升瓶装的使用时长。
Ophthalmology. 1994 Oct;101(10):1658-61. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31119-5.
2
Evaluation of once-daily levobunolol 0.25% and timolol 0.25% therapy for increased intraocular pressure.每日一次使用0.25%左布诺洛尔和0.25%噻吗洛尔治疗眼压升高的疗效评估。
Am J Ophthalmol. 1991 Jul 15;112(1):56-60. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)76213-0.
3
[Comparative study of levobunolol and timolol in the treatment of chronic open-angle glaucoma and chronic ocular hypertension].左旋布诺洛尔与噻吗洛尔治疗慢性开角型青光眼和慢性高眼压症的对比研究
J Fr Ophtalmol. 1988;11(8-9):587-90.
4
A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of 0.5% timolol maleate ophthalmic gel-forming solution QD and 0.5% levobunolol hydrochloride BID in patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma.
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2002 Apr;18(2):105-13. doi: 10.1089/108076802317373860.
5
Long-term evaluation of 0.25% levobunolol and timolol for therapy for elevated intraocular pressure.
Arch Ophthalmol. 1988 May;106(5):614-8. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1988.01060130668023.
6
Efficacy and tolerability of 0.5% timolol maleate ophthalmic gel-forming solution QD compared with 0.5% levobunolol hydrochloride BID in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Clin Ther. 1998 Nov-Dec;20(6):1170-8. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(98)80112-4.
7
Efficacy and safety of once-daily levobunolol for glaucoma therapy.
Can J Ophthalmol. 1989 Feb;24(1):2-6.
8
[Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of levobunolol and timolol in ocular hypertension and chronic open-angle glaucoma].[左旋布诺洛尔与噻吗洛尔治疗高眼压症和慢性开角型青光眼的有效性和安全性比较]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1988 Sep;193(3):257-60. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1050254.
9
A cross-over trial comparing once daily levobunolol with once and twice daily timolol.一项交叉试验,比较每日一次的左布诺洛尔与每日一次和每日两次的噻吗洛尔。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 1995 Jul-Sep;5(3):172-6. doi: 10.1177/112067219500500305.
10
Treatment of elevated intraocular pressure with concurrent levobunolol and pilocarpine.
Can J Ophthalmol. 1987 Jun;22(4):208-11.

引用本文的文献

1
An objective assessment of the variability in number of drops per bottle of glaucoma medication.对每瓶青光眼药物滴数变异性的客观评估。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 May 22;17(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0473-8.