Milgrom P, Weinstein P, Golletz D, Leroux B, Domoto P
Department of Dental Public Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.
Pediatr Dent. 1994 Jul-Aug;16(4):294-300.
A mail survey of 198 Seattle dentists who treat children assessed their beliefs about pain control in school-aged children and examined the relationship of those beliefs to pain management behaviors. The survey population of general dentists and pediatric dentists in clinics and private practice had a response rate of 89.6%. Two of three dentists always use local anesthetic when doing restorations or extractions and also provide more anesthetic at the child's request. One in three dentists never provides postoperative medication following tooth extractions. Ten percent regularly deny child pain and many do not believe child pain reports are valid. Dentists who work in private practice are more likely to provide local anesthetic than are dentists who work in clinics. Dentists who desire more control over a child are less likely to provide local anesthetic. Dentists who question children about comfort are more likely to provide additional anesthetic based on a child's report of discomfort and to provide postoperative medication if the dentist perceives a dental procedure to be painful.
一项针对198名治疗儿童的西雅图牙医的邮件调查,评估了他们对学龄儿童疼痛控制的看法,并研究了这些看法与疼痛管理行为之间的关系。参与调查的综合牙医以及诊所和私人执业的儿科牙医的回复率为89.6%。三分之二的牙医在进行修复或拔牙时总是使用局部麻醉剂,并且也会根据孩子的要求提供更多麻醉剂。三分之一的牙医在拔牙后从不提供术后药物。10%的牙医经常否认孩子疼痛,而且许多人不相信孩子的疼痛报告是真实的。在私人执业的牙医比在诊所工作的牙医更有可能提供局部麻醉剂。希望对孩子有更多控制权的牙医提供局部麻醉剂的可能性较小。询问孩子舒适度的牙医更有可能根据孩子不适的报告提供额外的麻醉剂,并且如果牙医认为牙科手术很痛苦,会提供术后药物。