• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠息肉的生长:检测后1年,对未切除的小于10毫米息肉的转归及评估

Growth of colorectal polyps: recovery and evaluation of unresected polyps of less than 10 mm, 1 year after detection.

作者信息

Hofstad B, Vatn M, Larsen S, Osnes M

机构信息

Medical Dept, Ullevål Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Scand J Gastroenterol. 1994 Jul;29(7):640-5. doi: 10.3109/00365529409092485.

DOI:10.3109/00365529409092485
PMID:7939401
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

Colonoscopic 1-year control of polyps of less than 10 mm left in situ was carried out in 103 (89%) of 116 originally examined patients.

RESULTS

Analysis showed an 85% recovery: 91% and 81% for polyps of 5-9 mm and < 5 mm, respectively. The recovery was significantly related to size and localization, whereas the growth rate was inversely correlated to the originally measured diameter. A linear relationship was demonstrated between anus-to-polyp distances 1 year apart, with a normalized agreement index of 0.70. In only 1 of 189 polyps, an increase of diameter to > 10 mm was demonstrated. The 79 new polyps in 52 (50%) of the patients were significantly smaller, more often right-sided, and related to multiplicity of polyps at the initial examination but not to growth of recovered polyps or cleansing status.

CONCLUSION

An acceptable recovery and growth rate of polyps < 10 mm seems to justify the continuation of the study for the remaining 2 years.

摘要

背景与方法

对116例最初接受检查的患者中的103例(89%)进行了结肠镜检查,对直径小于10mm的原位息肉进行了为期1年的监测。

结果

分析显示息肉的回收率为85%:5-9mm和小于5mm的息肉回收率分别为91%和81%。回收率与息肉大小和位置显著相关,而生长率与最初测量的直径呈负相关。相隔1年的肛门到息肉的距离之间呈现线性关系,标准化一致性指数为0.70。在189个息肉中,仅有1个息肉直径增大至大于10mm。52例(50%)患者中的79个新发息肉明显更小,更多位于右侧,且与初次检查时息肉的多发性有关,但与已恢复息肉的生长或清洁状态无关。

结论

直径小于10mm的息肉具有可接受的回收率和生长率,这似乎为继续进行为期2年的后续研究提供了依据。

相似文献

1
Growth of colorectal polyps: recovery and evaluation of unresected polyps of less than 10 mm, 1 year after detection.结直肠息肉的生长:检测后1年,对未切除的小于10毫米息肉的转归及评估
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1994 Jul;29(7):640-5. doi: 10.3109/00365529409092485.
2
Epidemiology of polyps in the rectum and colon. Recovery and evaluation of unresected polyps 2 years after detection.直肠和结肠息肉的流行病学。息肉检测2年后未切除息肉的转归及评估
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1986 Sep;21(7):853-62. doi: 10.3109/00365528609011130.
3
Growth of colorectal polyps: redetection and evaluation of unresected polyps for a period of three years.结直肠息肉的生长:对未切除息肉进行为期三年的重新检测与评估
Gut. 1996 Sep;39(3):449-56. doi: 10.1136/gut.39.3.449.
4
Gender differences in colorectal polyps and tumors.结直肠息肉和肿瘤中的性别差异。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Mar;96(3):882-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.3638_a.x.
5
[Clinical, enteroscopic, and pathological characteristics of 796 cases of colorectal polyps].796例大肠息肉的临床、肠镜及病理特征
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2005 Aug;30(4):463-6.
6
Large colorectal polyps: colonoscopy, pathology, and management.大型结直肠息肉:结肠镜检查、病理学及管理
Am J Gastroenterol. 1989 Aug;84(8):898-905.
7
Predictors of presence, multiplicity, size and dysplasia of colorectal adenomas. A necropsy study in New Zealand.结直肠腺瘤的存在、多发性、大小及发育异常的预测因素。新西兰的一项尸检研究。
Gut. 1992 Nov;33(11):1508-14. doi: 10.1136/gut.33.11.1508.
8
Small rectosigmoid polyps as markers of proximal neoplasms.
Dis Colon Rectum. 1993 Dec;36(12):1121-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02052260.
9
Reliability of in situ measurements of colorectal polyps.结直肠息肉原位测量的可靠性。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1992;27(1):59-64. doi: 10.3109/00365529209011168.
10
[Prognosis of colorectal tumors in patients with synchronous polyps].[同步息肉患者结直肠肿瘤的预后]
Minerva Dietol Gastroenterol. 1990 Jul-Sep;36(3):157-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Natural History of Colorectal Polyps Undergoing Longitudinal in Vivo CT Colonography Surveillance.结直肠息肉行 CT 结肠成像纵向体内监测的自然史。
Radiology. 2024 Jan;310(1):e232078. doi: 10.1148/radiol.232078.
2
Growth rates and histopathological outcomes of small (6-9 mm) colorectal polyps based on CT colonography surveillance and endoscopic removal.基于 CT 结肠成像监测和内镜下切除的小(6-9mm)结直肠息肉的生长速度和组织病理学结果。
Gut. 2023 Nov 24;72(12):2321-2328. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-326970.
3
Screening colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy for reduction of colorectal cancer incidence: A case-control study.
筛查结肠镜检查和乙状结肠镜检查对降低结直肠癌发病率的作用:一项病例对照研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 5;14(12):e0226027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226027. eCollection 2019.
4
The Natural History of Colorectal Polyps: Overview of Predictive Static and Dynamic Features.结直肠息肉的自然史:预测静态和动态特征概述。
Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2018 Sep;47(3):515-536. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
5
Assessment of volumetric growth rates of small colorectal polyps with CT colonography: a longitudinal study of natural history.用 CT 结肠成像评估小结直肠息肉的体积增长率:自然史的纵向研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jul;14(8):711-20. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70216-X. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
6
Detectability of colon polyp using computed virtual chromoendoscopy with flexible spectral imaging color enhancement.使用带有灵活光谱成像颜色增强技术的计算机虚拟染色内镜检查法检测结肠息肉的可检测性。
Diagn Ther Endosc. 2012;2012:596303. doi: 10.1155/2012/596303. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
7
Antioxidant supplements for prevention of mortality in healthy participants and patients with various diseases.抗氧化剂补充剂对健康参与者及各类疾病患者死亡率的预防作用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD007176. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007176.pub2.
8
Next-generation stool DNA test accurately detects colorectal cancer and large adenomas.下一代粪便 DNA 检测能准确检测结直肠癌和大型腺瘤。
Gastroenterology. 2012 Feb;142(2):248-56; quiz e25-6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.10.031. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
9
Risk of advanced metachronous colorectal adenoma during long-term follow-up.长期随访期间晚期异时性结直肠腺瘤的风险。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008 Nov;23(11):1065-71. doi: 10.1007/s00384-008-0508-y. Epub 2008 Jul 3.
10
The evaluation of rectal bleeding in adults. A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing four diagnostic strategies.成人直肠出血的评估。一项比较四种诊断策略的成本效益分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Jan;20(1):81-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40077.x.