Nishida T, Ku Y, Saitoh Y
First Dept. of Surgery, Kobe University School of Medicine.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1994 Sep;21(13):2291-4.
We compared the efficacy of transarterial heating (group I; n = 5) with transportal heating (group II; n = 3) in regional liver hyperthermia. In beagles, the femoro-hepatic arterial (FA-HA) or the femoro-portal (FV-PV) heating bypass was made. Mean bypass flow rates in groups I and II were set at 120 ml/min and 260 ml/min, respectively, simulating either actual hepatic arterial flow or portal flow rates. Bypass heating was initiated by soaking a warmer coil into the water bath kept at 45 degrees C and maintained for 60 min. The temperature of the inflow line in groups I (44.4 +/- 0.1 degrees C) and II (44.5 +/- 0.1 degrees C) became similar 5 min after the start of heating. The liver parenchymal temperature of group I promptly reached 42.0 +/- 0.9 degrees C at 30 min and could be easily controlled at a range of 42.0-42.5 degrees C thereafter. However, despite a higher heated blood flow rate in group II, the liver parenchymal temperature remained 41.1 +/- 0.1 degrees C at 60 min (p < 0.01, vs. group I). The highest rectal temperature of group I was 38.9 +/- 0.8 degrees C, while that of group II was 40.5 +/- 0.2 degrees C (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the effect of transarterial heating was superior to that of transportal heating, indicating the different thermokinetics in regional liver hyperthermia in the two methods.
我们比较了经动脉加热(I组;n = 5)与经门静脉加热(II组;n = 3)在区域性肝热疗中的疗效。在比格犬身上,制作了股-肝动脉(FA-HA)或股-门静脉(FV-PV)加热旁路。I组和II组的平均旁路流速分别设定为120 ml/min和260 ml/min,以模拟实际肝动脉血流或门静脉流速。通过将加热线圈浸泡在保持在45摄氏度的水浴中启动旁路加热,并持续60分钟。加热开始5分钟后,I组(44.4 +/- 0.1摄氏度)和II组(44.5 +/- 0.1摄氏度)的流入管线温度变得相似。I组肝实质温度在30分钟时迅速达到42.0 +/- 0.9摄氏度,此后可轻松控制在42.0 - 42.5摄氏度范围内。然而,尽管II组的加热血流速率较高,但其肝实质温度在60分钟时仍为41.1 +/- 0.1摄氏度(与I组相比,p < 0.01)。I组的最高直肠温度为38.9 +/- 0.8摄氏度,而II组为40.5 +/- 0.2摄氏度(p < 0.05)。总之,经动脉加热的效果优于经门静脉加热,表明两种方法在区域性肝热疗中的热动力学不同。