Nurnberger J I, Blehar M C, Kaufmann C A, York-Cooler C, Simpson S G, Harkavy-Friedman J, Severe J B, Malaspina D, Reich T
Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1994 Nov;51(11):849-59; discussion 863-4. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950110009002.
This article reports on the development and reliability of the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies (DIGS), a clinical interview especially constructed for the assessment of major mood and psychotic disorders and their spectrum conditions. The DIGS, which was developed and piloted as a collaborative effort of investigators from sites in the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Genetics Initiative, has the following additional features: (1) polydiagnostic capacity; (2) a detailed assessment of the course of the illness, chronology of psychotic and mood syndromes, and comorbidity; (3) additional phenomenologic assessments of symptoms; and (4) algorithmic scoring capability. The DIGS is designed to be employed by interviewers who exercise significant clinical judgment and who summarize information in narrative form as well as in ratings. A two-phase test-retest (within-site, between-site) reliability study was carried out for DSM-III-R criteria-based major depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and schizoaffective disorder. Reliabilities using algorithms were excellent (0.73 to 0.95), except for schizoaffective disorder, for which disagreement on estimates of duration of mood syndromes relative to psychosis reduced reliability. A final best-estimate process using medical records and information from relatives as well as algorithmic diagnoses is expected to be more reliable in making these distinctions. The DIGS should be useful as part of archival data gathering for genetic studies of major affective disorders, schizophrenia, and related conditions.
本文报告了用于遗传学研究的诊断访谈(DIGS)的开发情况及其可靠性。DIGS是一种专门为评估主要情绪和精神障碍及其谱系状况而构建的临床访谈。DIGS是由美国国立精神卫生研究所(NIMH)遗传学倡议项目各研究点的研究人员共同开发并进行试点的,它具有以下额外特点:(1)多诊断能力;(2)对疾病病程、精神病性和情绪综合征的时间顺序以及共病情况进行详细评估;(3)对症状进行额外的现象学评估;(4)算法评分能力。DIGS旨在供具备重要临床判断力的访谈者使用,这些访谈者需以叙述形式和评分方式总结信息。针对基于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订版(DSM-III-R)标准的重度抑郁症、双相情感障碍、精神分裂症和分裂情感性障碍,开展了一个两阶段的重测(研究点内、研究点间)可靠性研究。除分裂情感性障碍外,使用算法得出的可靠性极佳(0.73至0.95),在分裂情感性障碍中,由于对情绪综合征相对于精神病的持续时间估计存在分歧,导致可靠性降低。预计使用病历、亲属提供的信息以及算法诊断的最终最佳估计过程在进行这些区分时会更可靠。DIGS作为主要情感障碍、精神分裂症及相关病症遗传学研究档案数据收集的一部分应会很有用。