• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊部门的就诊情况:是不必要的还是不恰当的?

Attendance at accident and emergency departments: unnecessary or inappropriate?

作者信息

Lowy A, Kohler B, Nicholl J

机构信息

Medical Care Research Unit, University of Sheffield.

出版信息

J Public Health Med. 1994 Jun;16(2):134-40. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042947.

DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042947
PMID:7946485
Abstract

The proportion of attenders at accident and emergency (A&E) departments who present 'inappropriately' with conditions which could be managed in general practice has been estimated at between 6.7 per cent and 64-89 per cent. These estimates have been based on subjective assessments by clinicians, or on an objective classification developed by the Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust (NPHT). This study sought to validate this classification, and to develop and validate other objective systems of classifying A&E attenders. Two novel methods were devised, one based on the ICD-9 diagnosis and one primarily on processes of care. All three techniques were validated against the pooled opinions of a sample of general practitioners (GPs). The existing NPHT classification was found to be very unreliable. The new diagnostic method was more specific but had poor sensitivity, whereas the technique based on processes of care agreed remarkably well with the sample of GPs. This method was applied retrospectively to random samples of 8877 adult self-referrals to 16 English A&E departments, and yielded an estimate that 23 per cent could have been treated in general practice. This approach provides a simple and valid retrospective method for identifying patients who were suitable for care in general practice. The method may be used to identify groups of patients who frequently attend inappropriately, to identify areas in which primary care needs are not being effectively met in general practice, and to form a basis for planning and auditing strategies to meet those needs in a more appropriate setting.

摘要

因一些在全科医疗中即可处理的病情而“不恰当”前往急诊部门就诊的患者比例,估计在6.7%至64 - 89%之间。这些估计是基于临床医生的主观评估,或者是基于纳菲尔德省立医院信托基金(NPHT)制定的客观分类。本研究旨在验证这种分类,并开发和验证其他对急诊就诊者进行分类的客观系统。设计了两种新方法,一种基于国际疾病分类第九版(ICD - 9)诊断,另一种主要基于护理流程。所有三种技术都对照了一组全科医生(GP)的综合意见进行验证。发现现有的NPHT分类非常不可靠。新的诊断方法更具特异性,但敏感性较差,而基于护理流程的技术与全科医生样本的一致性非常好。该方法被回顾性应用于随机抽取的8877名成年自我转诊至16个英国急诊部门的样本,得出估计有23%的患者本可在全科医疗中得到治疗。这种方法为识别适合在全科医疗中接受治疗的患者提供了一种简单有效的回顾性方法。该方法可用于识别经常不恰当就诊的患者群体,识别在全科医疗中初级保健需求未得到有效满足的领域,并为制定和审核在更合适环境中满足这些需求的策略奠定基础。

相似文献

1
Attendance at accident and emergency departments: unnecessary or inappropriate?急诊部门的就诊情况:是不必要的还是不恰当的?
J Public Health Med. 1994 Jun;16(2):134-40. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042947.
2
A review of health professional attitudes and patient perceptions on 'inappropriate' accident and emergency attendances. The implications for current minor injury service provision in England and Wales.对医疗专业人员关于“不适当”的事故与急诊就诊的态度以及患者认知的综述。对英格兰和威尔士当前轻伤服务提供情况的影响。
J Adv Nurs. 2000 May;31(5):1097-105. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01379.x.
3
Inappropriate attendance at accident and emergency departments: a literature review.
J Adv Nurs. 1993 Jul;18(7):1141-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1993.18071141.x.
4
Inappropriate attendance in accident and emergency.
Accid Emerg Nurs. 1997 Apr;5(2):102-6. doi: 10.1016/s0965-2302(97)90091-6.
5
Do patients use minor injury units appropriately?患者是否恰当地使用了轻伤单位?
J Public Health Med. 1996 Jun;18(2):152-6. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024474.
6
Primary care in accident and emergency and general practice: a comparison.事故与急诊中的初级医疗与全科医疗:一项比较
Soc Sci Med. 1992 Oct;35(8):987-95. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90238-l.
7
[Many patients treated in the emergency department could be treated by a general practitioner on call].许多在急诊科接受治疗的患者可以由随叫随到的全科医生进行治疗。
Ugeskr Laeger. 1999 Aug 16;161(33):4624-7.
8
How to minimize inappropriate utilization of Accident and Emergency Departments: improve the validity of classifying the general practice cases amongst the A&E attendees.如何尽量减少急诊科的不当使用:提高在急诊科就诊人群中对全科医疗病例分类的准确性。
Health Policy. 2003 Nov;66(2):159-68. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(03)00023-x.
9
'Inappropriate' attendance at an accident and emergency department by adults registered in local general practices: how is it related to their use of primary care?在当地全科诊所登记的成年人在急诊科的“不适当”就诊情况:这与他们对初级医疗服务的使用有何关联?
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002 Jul;7(3):160-5. doi: 10.1258/135581902760082463.
10
Inappropriate--the patient or the service?
Accid Emerg Nurs. 1995 Jul;3(3):146-9. doi: 10.1016/s0965-2302(95)80009-3.

引用本文的文献

1
[Initial assessment of ENT emergencies-a feasibility study].[耳鼻喉科急症的初步评估——一项可行性研究]
HNO. 2025 Feb;73(2):111-121. doi: 10.1007/s00106-024-01434-x. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
2
Identification of low-acuity attendances in routine clinical information documented in German Emergency Departments.在德国急诊科常规临床信息记录中识别低危就诊。
BMC Emerg Med. 2023 Jun 6;23(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00838-2.
3
Non-hospital healthcare center's preparedness assessment toolbar for providing basic emergency care: a sequential exploratory mixed-method study.
非医院医疗保健中心提供基本急救护理的准备情况评估工具包:一项序贯探索性混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jan 23;23(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09053-y.
4
Using vignettes to assess the accuracy and rationale of paramedic decisions on conveyance to the emergency department.使用案例 vignettes 评估护理人员关于转运至急诊科决策的准确性和合理性。 (注:这里“vignettes”直译为“小插图”,在医学研究语境中可能是特定的案例描述形式等,具体含义需结合上下文确定准确译法,这里暂保留英文以便理解原文确切所指)
Br Paramed J. 2019 Jun 1;4(1):6-13. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2019.06.4.1.6.
5
How sensitive are avoidable emergency department attendances to primary care quality? Retrospective observational study.可避免的急诊就诊对初级保健质量有多敏感?回顾性观察研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Nov;30(11):884-892. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011651. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
6
Developing and validating an instrument to assess non-hospital health centers' preparedness to provide initial emergency care: a study protocol.制定并验证一种评估非医院健康中心提供初步急救能力的工具:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 27;9(7):e026651. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026651.
7
General practitioners providing non-urgent care in emergency department: a natural experiment.在急诊科提供非紧急护理的全科医生:一项自然实验。
BMJ Open. 2018 May 10;8(5):e019736. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019736.
8
Characterising non-urgent users of the emergency department (ED): A retrospective analysis of routine ED data.急诊科非紧急情况就诊患者的特征分析:对急诊科常规数据的回顾性分析
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 23;13(2):e0192855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192855. eCollection 2018.
9
Primary care professionals providing non-urgent care in hospital emergency departments.在医院急诊科提供非紧急护理的基层医疗专业人员。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 13;2(2):CD002097. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002097.pub4.
10
To GP or not to GP: a natural experiment in children triaged to see a GP in a tertiary paediatric emergency department (ED).是否看全科医生:在三级儿科急诊分诊看全科医生的儿童自然试验。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Jul;27(7):521-528. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006605. Epub 2017 Sep 29.