Suppr超能文献

苏格兰癌症登记数据的准确性如何?

How accurate are Scottish cancer registration data?

作者信息

Brewster D, Crichton J, Muir C

机构信息

Scottish Cancer Intelligence Unit, Information & Statistics Division of the Common Services Agency for the National Health Service in Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 1994 Nov;70(5):954-9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1994.428.

Abstract

In order to assess the accuracy of Scottish cancer registration data, a random sample of 2,200 registrations, attributed to the year 1990, was generated. Relevant medical records were available for review in 2,021 (92%) cases. Registration details were reabstracted from available records and compared with data in the registry. Discrepancies in identifying items of data (surname, forename, sex and date of birth) were found in 3.5% of cases. Most were trivial and would not disturb record linkage. Discrepancy rates of 7.1% in post code of residence at the time of diagnosis (excluding differences arising through boundary changes), 11.0% in anniversary date (excluding differences of 6 weeks or less), 7.7% in histological verification status, 5.4% in ICD-9 site codes (the first three digits) and 14.5% in ICD-O morphology codes (excluding 'inferred' morphology codes) were recorded. Overall, serious discrepancies were judged to have occurred in 2.8% of cases. In many respects, therefore, Scottish cancer registration data show a high level of accuracy that compares favourably to the reported accuracy of the few other cancer registries undertaking such analyses.

摘要

为评估苏格兰癌症登记数据的准确性,生成了一份随机抽取的、归属于1990年的2200份登记样本。在2021例(92%)病例中可获取相关医疗记录以供审查。登记细节从现有记录中重新提取并与登记处的数据进行比较。在3.5%的病例中发现了数据项(姓氏、名字、性别和出生日期)识别方面的差异。大多数差异微不足道,不会干扰记录链接。记录显示,诊断时居住邮政编码的差异率为7.1%(不包括因边界变化产生的差异),周年日期的差异率为11.0%(不包括6周或更短时间的差异),组织学验证状态的差异率为7.7%,ICD - 9部位编码(前三位数字)的差异率为5.4%,ICD - O形态学编码的差异率为14.5%(不包括“推断”的形态学编码)。总体而言,判定2.8%的病例存在严重差异。因此,在许多方面,苏格兰癌症登记数据显示出较高的准确性,与其他少数进行此类分析的癌症登记处报告的准确性相比具有优势。

相似文献

6
An audit of the quality of cancer registration data.癌症登记数据质量审计。
Br J Cancer. 1992 Sep;66(3):552-4. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1992.312.
7
Reliability of cancer registration data in Scotland, 1997.1997年苏格兰癌症登记数据的可靠性
Eur J Cancer. 2002 Feb;38(3):414-7. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00385-9.
9
Accuracy of cancer registration.癌症登记的准确性。
Br J Prev Soc Med. 1976 Sep;30(3):187-92. doi: 10.1136/jech.30.3.187.

引用本文的文献

5
Quality control on digital cancer registration.癌症登记数字质量控制。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 22;17(12):e0279415. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279415. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

3
The reliability of Cancer Registry records.癌症登记记录的可靠性。
Br J Cancer. 1993 Apr;67(4):819-21. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1993.149.
5
Estimation of completeness of cancer registration.癌症登记完整性评估。
Int J Epidemiol. 1982 Dec;11(4):362-7. doi: 10.1093/ije/11.4.362.
7
Sources of error in the registration of oral cancer.口腔癌登记中的误差来源。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1984 Jun;22(3):195-200. doi: 10.1016/0266-4356(84)90097-4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验