• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状动脉搭桥术后靶控输注咪达唑仑镇静的群体药代动力学。

Population pharmacokinetics of midazolam administered by target controlled infusion for sedation following coronary artery bypass grafting.

作者信息

Zomorodi K, Donner A, Somma J, Barr J, Sladen R, Ramsay J, Geller E, Shafer S L

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Stanford University, California, USA.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 1998 Dec;89(6):1418-29. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199812000-00020.

DOI:10.1097/00000542-199812000-00020
PMID:9856717
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Midazolam is commonly used for short-term postoperative sedation of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The purpose of this multicenter study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics and intersubject variability of midazolam in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

METHODS

With institutional review board approval, 90 consenting patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were enrolled at three study centers. All subjects received sufentanil and midazolam via target-controlled infusions. After operation, midazolam was titrated to maintain deep sedation for at least 2 h. It was then titrated downward to decrease sedation for a minimum of 4 h more and was discontinued before tracheal extubation. Arterial blood samples were taken throughout the study and were assayed for midazolam and 1-hydroxymidazolam. Midazolam population pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using NONMEM. Cross-validation was used to estimate the performance of the model.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetics of midazolam were best described by a simple three-compartment mammillary model. Typical pharmacokinetic parameters were V1 = 32.2 l, V2 = 53 l, V3 = 245 l, Cl1 = 0.43 l/min, Cl2 = 0.56 l/min, and Cl3 = 0.39 l/min. The calculated elimination half-life was 15 h. The median absolute prediction error was 25%, with a bias of 1.4%. The performance in the cross-validation was similar. Midazolam metabolites were clinically insignificant in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The intersubject variability and predictability of the three-compartment pharmacokinetic model are similar to those of other intravenous anesthetic drugs. This multicenter study did not confirm previous studies of exceptionally large variability of midazolam pharmacokinetics when used for sedation in intensive care settings.

摘要

背景

咪达唑仑常用于心脏手术患者的短期术后镇静。这项多中心研究的目的是描述冠状动脉旁路移植术患者中咪达唑仑的药代动力学及个体间变异性。

方法

经机构审查委员会批准,三个研究中心招募了90例接受冠状动脉旁路移植术且同意参与研究的患者。所有受试者通过靶控输注接受舒芬太尼和咪达唑仑。术后,滴定咪达唑仑以维持深度镇静至少2小时。然后向下滴定以减少镇静至少4小时,并在气管插管前停药。在整个研究过程中采集动脉血样,检测其中咪达唑仑和1-羟基咪达唑仑的含量。使用NONMEM估算咪达唑仑群体药代动力学参数。采用交叉验证评估模型性能。

结果

咪达唑仑的药代动力学最佳用简单的三室乳突模型描述。典型的药代动力学参数为V1 = 32.2升,V2 = 53升,V3 = 245升,Cl1 = 0.43升/分钟,Cl2 = 0.56升/分钟,Cl3 = 0.39升/分钟。计算得出的消除半衰期为15小时。中位绝对预测误差为25%,偏差为1.4%。交叉验证中的性能相似。咪达唑仑代谢产物在所有患者中临床意义不大。

结论

三室药代动力学模型的个体间变异性和可预测性与其他静脉麻醉药物相似。这项多中心研究未证实先前关于咪达唑仑用于重症监护镇静时药代动力学存在异常大的变异性的研究结果。

相似文献

1
Population pharmacokinetics of midazolam administered by target controlled infusion for sedation following coronary artery bypass grafting.冠状动脉搭桥术后靶控输注咪达唑仑镇静的群体药代动力学。
Anesthesiology. 1998 Dec;89(6):1418-29. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199812000-00020.
2
Population pharmacodynamics of midazolam administered by target controlled infusion in SICU patients after CABG surgery.冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后入住外科重症监护病房(SICU)的患者中,靶控输注咪达唑仑的群体药效学。
Anesthesiology. 1998 Dec;89(6):1430-43. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199812000-00021.
3
Comparative population pharmacokinetics of lorazepam and midazolam during long-term continuous infusion in critically ill patients.危重症患者长期持续输注劳拉西泮和咪达唑仑的比较群体药代动力学
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Feb;57(2):135-45. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01957.x.
4
A double-blind, randomized comparison of i.v. lorazepam versus midazolam for sedation of ICU patients via a pharmacologic model.通过药理学模型对静脉注射劳拉西泮与咪达唑仑用于重症监护病房患者镇静的双盲随机对照研究。
Anesthesiology. 2001 Aug;95(2):286-98. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200108000-00007.
5
Optimizing sedation following major vascular surgery: a double-blind study of midazolam administered by continuous infusion.大型血管手术后镇静的优化:咪达唑仑持续输注的双盲研究
Can J Anaesth. 1994 Sep;41(9):782-93. doi: 10.1007/BF03011584.
6
A placebo- and midazolam-controlled phase I single ascending-dose study evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of remimazolam (CNS 7056): Part II. Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling and simulation.一项安慰剂和咪达唑仑对照的 I 期单递增剂量研究,评估雷米唑仑(CNS 7056)的安全性、药代动力学和药效学:第二部分。群体药代动力学和药效学建模与模拟。
Anesth Analg. 2012 Aug;115(2):284-96. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318241f68a. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
7
Pharmacokinetics of long-term sufentanil infusion for sedation in ICU patients.重症监护病房患者长期输注舒芬太尼镇静的药代动力学
Intensive Care Med. 2003 Nov;29(11):1916-20. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1920-y. Epub 2003 Aug 16.
8
Pharmacokinetics of computer-controlled alfentanil administration in children undergoing cardiac surgery.心脏手术患儿中计算机控制阿芬太尼给药的药代动力学
Anesthesiology. 1995 Nov;83(5):944-55. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199511000-00006.
9
Infusion of propofol versus midazolam for sedation in the intensive care unit following coronary artery surgery.冠状动脉搭桥术后在重症监护病房输注丙泊酚与咪达唑仑用于镇静的比较。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1993 Apr;7(2):142-7. doi: 10.1016/1053-0770(93)90206-z.
10
The effect of age on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of midazolam.年龄对咪达唑仑药代动力学和药效学的影响。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999 Jun;65(6):630-9. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9236(99)90084-X.

引用本文的文献

1
Target controlled infusion in the intensive care unit: a scoping review.重症监护病房中的靶控输注:一项范围综述
J Clin Monit Comput. 2025 Sep 9. doi: 10.1007/s10877-025-01356-1.
2
Real-time evaluation of the independent analgesic efficacy of dexmedetomidine.实时评估右美托咪定的独立镇痛疗效。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Mar 4;23(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02022-2.
3
Pharmacodynamic modeling of moderate sedation and rationale for dosing using midazolam, propofol and alfentanil.咪达唑仑、丙泊酚和阿芬太尼中度镇静的药效学模型及剂量设定的原理。
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2023 Jan 16;24(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40360-023-00642-5.
4
Simulation-Based Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Sedations: A Novel Validation to Multidrug Pharmacodynamic Modeling.基于模拟的胃肠内镜检查镇静:多药药效学建模的一种新型验证
Pharmaceutics. 2022 Sep 27;14(10):2056. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14102056.
5
Usefulness of Continuous Low-Dose Fentanyl in Combination with Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam for Intravenous Sedation: A Randomised Controlled Trial.连续低剂量芬太尼联合右美托咪定和咪达唑仑用于静脉镇静的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 May 16;2022:2807581. doi: 10.1155/2022/2807581. eCollection 2022.
6
Efficacy of two types of palliative sedation therapy defined using intervention protocols: proportional vs. deep sedation.采用干预方案定义的两种姑息性镇静治疗的疗效:比例镇静与深度镇静。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Jun;26(6):1763-1771. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-4011-2. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
7
Spatio-temporal dynamics of multimodal EEG-fNIRS signals in the loss and recovery of consciousness under sedation using midazolam and propofol.使用咪达唑仑和丙泊酚镇静时意识丧失和恢复过程中多模态脑电图-功能近红外光谱信号的时空动态
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 9;12(11):e0187743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187743. eCollection 2017.
8
Optimal and safe standard doses of midazolam and propofol to achieve patient and doctor satisfaction with dental treatment: A prospective cohort study.咪达唑仑和丙泊酚达到患者及医生对牙科治疗满意度的最佳安全标准剂量:一项前瞻性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 9;12(2):e0171627. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171627. eCollection 2017.
9
Dexmedetomidine versus Midazolam in Procedural Sedation. A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety.右美托咪定与咪达唑仑用于操作过程中的镇静:疗效与安全性的系统评价
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 20;12(1):e0169525. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169525. eCollection 2017.
10
Scaling clearance in paediatric pharmacokinetics: All models are wrong, which are useful?儿科药代动力学中的清除率标度:所有模型都是错误的,哪些是有用的?
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Apr;83(4):777-790. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13160. Epub 2016 Dec 2.