Plotkowski M C, Saliba A M, Pereira S H, Cervante M P, Bajolet-Laudinat O
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Infect Immun. 1994 Dec;62(12):5456-63. doi: 10.1128/iai.62.12.5456-5463.1994.
The pathogenesis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa disseminated infections depends on bacterial interaction with blood vessels. We have hypothesized that in order to traverse the endothelial barrier, bacteria would have to adhere to and damage endothelial cells. To test this hypothesis, we studied the adherence to human endothelial cells in primary culture of the piliated P. aeruginosa strain PAK and of two isogenic nonpiliated strains: PAK/p-, which carries a mutation in the pilin structural gene, and PAK-N1, a mutant defective in the regulatory rpoN gene. PAK adhered significantly more than did the pilus-lacking strains. P. aeruginosa was also taken up by endothelial cells, as determined by quantitative bacteriologic assays and by transmission electron microscopy. This internalization of P. aeruginosa seems to be a selective process, since the piliated strain was taken up significantly more than the nonpiliated bacteria and the avirulent Escherichia coli DH5 alpha, even following bacterial centrifugation onto the cell monolayers. A significant fraction of the internalized P. aeruginosa PAK was recovered in a viable form after 6 h of residence within endothelial cells. Progressive endothelial cell damage resulted from PAK intracellular harboring, as indicated by the release of lactate dehydrogenase. An increasing concentration of PAK cells was recovered from the extracellular medium with time, suggesting that ingested bacteria were released from endothelial cells and multiplied freely. We speculate that in vivo the ability of some P. aeruginosa strains to resist intracellular residence would afford protection from host defenses and antibiotics and that the release of viable bacteria into bloodstream may represent a central feature of the pathogenesis of bacteremia in compromised patients.
铜绿假单胞菌播散性感染的发病机制取决于细菌与血管的相互作用。我们推测,为了穿越内皮屏障,细菌必须黏附并损伤内皮细胞。为了验证这一假设,我们研究了菌毛型铜绿假单胞菌菌株PAK以及两个同基因非菌毛型菌株在原代培养的人内皮细胞上的黏附情况:PAK/p-,其菌毛蛋白结构基因发生突变;PAK-N1,一种调节性rpoN基因缺陷的突变体。PAK的黏附明显多于缺乏菌毛的菌株。通过定量细菌学检测和透射电子显微镜确定,铜绿假单胞菌也被内皮细胞摄取。铜绿假单胞菌的这种内化似乎是一个选择性过程,因为即使在将细菌离心到细胞单层上之后,菌毛型菌株的摄取也明显多于非菌毛型细菌和无毒的大肠杆菌DH5α。内化的铜绿假单胞菌PAK在驻留在内皮细胞6小时后,有相当一部分以活的形式被回收。如乳酸脱氢酶的释放所示,PAK在细胞内的存在导致内皮细胞逐渐受损。随着时间的推移,从细胞外培养基中回收的PAK细胞浓度不断增加,这表明摄入的细菌从内皮细胞中释放出来并自由繁殖。我们推测,在体内,一些铜绿假单胞菌菌株抵抗细胞内驻留的能力将使其免受宿主防御和抗生素的影响,而活细菌释放到血流中可能是受损患者菌血症发病机制的一个核心特征。