Conine T A, Hershler C, Daechsel D, Peel C, Pearson A
School of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Int J Rehabil Res. 1994 Jun;17(2):123-37. doi: 10.1097/00004356-199406000-00003.
A significantly lower proportion of the patients in the Jay group (25%) experienced pressure ulcer formation during the three months of observation as compared to the foam group (41%). No statistically significant differences were found between groups on the location, severity, or healing duration of the pressure ulcers. Most lesions (65%) were limited to persistent erythema of intact skin, and healed in three to four weeks. Significantly higher proportions of patients in the Jay groups (7%) rejected their cushion because of discomfort as compared to foam (1%). The incidence of pressure ulcers was significantly higher among those patients who experienced peak interface pressures recorded at 60 mmHg or higher, had low Norton scores (< or = 11), or were malnourished.
与泡沫组(41%)相比,Jay组中在观察的三个月期间出现压疮形成的患者比例显著更低(25%)。两组在压疮的位置、严重程度或愈合持续时间方面未发现统计学上的显著差异。大多数损伤(65%)局限于完整皮肤的持续性红斑,并在三到四周内愈合。与泡沫组(1%)相比,Jay组中有更高比例(7%)的患者因不适而拒绝使用他们的坐垫。在那些经历过记录的峰值界面压力为60 mmHg或更高、诺顿评分较低(≤11)或营养不良的患者中,压疮的发生率显著更高。