Kim Won-Jin, Chang Moonyoung
Department of Rehabilitation Science, Inje University.
J Phys Ther Sci. 2013 Sep;25(9):1185-7. doi: 10.1589/jpts.25.1185. Epub 2013 Oct 20.
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to determine the best adjustable cushions, for the maintenance of normal sitting balance by healthy persons in wheelchairs, from a foam cushion, and a newly-developed air-adjustable cushion. [Subjects] Eighteen healthy participants (9 men, 9 women) were recruited. [Methods] Participants were evaluated using the Force Sensing Array System to assess average sitting pressure and the symmetry index of chair sitting under the following conditions: no seat cushion, a foam cushion, and a newly-developed air-adjustable cushion. [Results] The results show that there were no significant differences among the average sitting pressures which were measured on the hard surface of a chair, a foam cushion, and the newly-developed cushion. The air-adjustable cushion's symmetry index turned out to be closer to 0 than those of the foam cushion and the hard surface of the chair. [Conclusion] We suggest that the newly-developed air-adjustable cushion contributes to a more symmetrical sitting posture than the basic foam cushion or no seat cushion.
[目的] 本研究的目的是从泡沫坐垫和新开发的空气可调节坐垫中,确定最适合轮椅上的健康人维持正常坐姿平衡的可调节坐垫。[对象] 招募了18名健康参与者(9名男性,9名女性)。[方法] 使用力传感阵列系统对参与者在以下条件下进行评估:无坐垫、泡沫坐垫和新开发的空气可调节坐垫,以评估平均坐姿压力和椅子坐姿的对称指数。[结果] 结果表明,在椅子硬表面、泡沫坐垫和新开发的坐垫上测量的平均坐姿压力之间没有显著差异。空气可调节坐垫的对称指数比泡沫坐垫和椅子硬表面的对称指数更接近0。[结论] 我们认为,新开发的空气可调节坐垫比基本的泡沫坐垫或无坐垫更有助于形成更对称的坐姿。