Goran M I, Calles-Escandon J, Poehlman E T, O'Connell M, Danforth E
Department of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington 05405.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1994 Jul;77(1):366-72. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1994.77.1.366.
This study was designed to examine effects of alterations in energy balance on adaptive changes in components of total energy expenditure (TEE). Nineteen young healthy males were studied during a 10-day sedentary energy balance baseline period and then randomly assigned to one of four 10-day treatment groups: 1) no change in energy intake (EI) or physical activity (PA; energy balance at low energy flux), 2) EI increased by 50% with no change in PA (positive energy balance), 3) TEE increased by 50% by increasing PA, matched by a 50% increase in EI (energy balance at high energy flux), and 4) TEE increased by 50% by increasing PA with no change in EI (negative energy balance). TEE was measured with doubly labeled water, resting metabolic rate (RMR) by indirect calorimetry, and thermic response to feeding (TEF) by indirect calorimetry; energy expenditure of physical activity (EEPA) was estimated by subtracting RMR, TEF, and prescribed PA from TEE. TEE was significantly increased by PA (by design) but not EI. There was a significant main effect of intake and a significant intake-by-activity interaction for changes in RMR. In post hoc analysis, RMR was significantly increased during positive energy balance and energy balance at high energy flux relative to change in RMR when energy balance was maintained at low energy flux. A significant increase in RMR was also noted during negative energy balance after adjustment for change in fat-free mass. There was no significant difference in change in RMR among the three treatment groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
本研究旨在探讨能量平衡改变对总能量消耗(TEE)各组成部分适应性变化的影响。19名年轻健康男性在为期10天的久坐能量平衡基线期接受研究,然后随机分配到四个为期10天的治疗组之一:1)能量摄入(EI)和身体活动(PA)无变化(低能量通量下的能量平衡);2)EI增加50%,PA无变化(正能量平衡);3)通过增加PA使TEE增加50%,同时EI增加50%以匹配(高能量通量下的能量平衡);4)通过增加PA使TEE增加50%,EI无变化(负能量平衡)。通过双标水测量TEE,通过间接测热法测量静息代谢率(RMR),通过间接测热法测量进食的热效应(TEF);身体活动的能量消耗(EEPA)通过从TEE中减去RMR、TEF和规定的PA来估算。PA(按设计)显著增加了TEE,但EI没有。RMR变化存在显著的摄入主效应和显著的摄入与活动交互作用。在事后分析中,相对于低能量通量下维持能量平衡时RMR的变化,正能量平衡和高能量通量下的能量平衡期间RMR显著增加。在调整去脂体重变化后,负能量平衡期间也观察到RMR显著增加。三个治疗组之间RMR的变化没有显著差异。(摘要截断于250字)