Buhl K M, Gallagher D, Hoy K, Matthews D E, Heymsfield S B
Department of Medicine, St Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
J Am Diet Assoc. 1995 Dec;95(12):1393-400; quiz 1401-2. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(95)00367-3.
Ten patients who had long-term disturbances in body weight regulation, were referred over a 3-year period for obesity evaluation, and reported low energy intakes (< 1,200 kcal/day).
To ascertain whether these patients had a low energy expenditure and thus reduced energy requirement, and/or whether they were misreporting their energy intake.
Comparison of outcome measures in referred patients and in obese control patients who did not report low energy intakes and disturbances in body weight regulation.
Low energy expenditure was evaluated with serum thyroid hormone levels, resting metabolic rate (RMR), thermic effect of food (TEF), and total energy expenditure (TEE) by doubly labeled water technique. Misreporting of energy intake was evaluated by comparing patients' self-reported energy intake with energy intake estimated by doubly labeled water and body composition analyses over a 14-day period.
Low energy expenditure was considered present in a patient if RMR or TEE was more than 15% below predicted values according to results from the control group. Patient group TEF was compared with TEF results observed in the control group.
All patients had normal serum thyroid hormone levels. Eight patients had RMR and TEE values within 15% of predicted values and were substantially underreporting their energy intake. One patient had low TEE (-19%) and a normal RMR, a finding that implies a low level of physical activity. This patient also underreported energy intake as estimated by the doubly labeled water technique during the study (-38%). The 10th patient had a low RMR (-23.2%) and TEE (-25.0%), the mechanism of which was uncertain. This patient's reported food intake over the 14-day period was accurate but was less than her long-term intake over months or years as suggested by doubly labeled water TEE estimates. The TEF response in patients was not significantly different from that observed in the control group.
Underreporting of energy intake from foods is a frequent finding in patients with disturbances in body weight regulation who are referred for obesity evaluation. Severe underreporting may be detectable by means of screening measures available to most dietitians. Low energy expenditure, due either to physical inactivity or to metabolic factors, is also observed. Modern evaluation methods provide new insights into patients with weight regulatory disturbances and at the same time stimulate important new research questions.
10名长期存在体重调节紊乱的患者,在3年期间被转诊进行肥胖评估,且报告能量摄入量较低(<1200千卡/天)。
确定这些患者是否能量消耗较低,从而能量需求减少,和/或他们是否误报了能量摄入量。
比较转诊患者与未报告低能量摄入和体重调节紊乱的肥胖对照患者的结果指标。
通过血清甲状腺激素水平、静息代谢率(RMR)、食物热效应(TEF)以及用双标记水技术测定的总能量消耗(TEE)来评估低能量消耗。通过比较患者自我报告的能量摄入量与双标记水和身体成分分析在14天期间估算的能量摄入量来评估能量摄入的误报情况。
如果根据对照组结果,RMR或TEE比预测值低15%以上,则认为患者存在低能量消耗。将患者组的TEF与对照组观察到的TEF结果进行比较。
所有患者血清甲状腺激素水平均正常。8名患者的RMR和TEE值在预测值的15%以内,但他们大量少报了能量摄入量。1名患者TEE较低(-19%),RMR正常,这一结果提示身体活动水平较低。该患者在研究期间通过双标记水技术估算也少报了能量摄入量(-38%)。第10名患者RMR较低(-23.2%),TEE较低(-25.0%),其机制尚不确定。该患者在14天期间报告的食物摄入量准确,但低于双标记水TEE估算所提示的其数月或数年的长期摄入量。患者的TEF反应与对照组观察到的无显著差异。
在因肥胖评估而转诊的体重调节紊乱患者中,食物能量摄入少报是常见现象。大多数营养师可用的筛查措施可能检测到严重少报情况。还观察到因身体活动不足或代谢因素导致的低能量消耗。现代评估方法为体重调节紊乱患者提供了新见解,同时也引发了重要的新研究问题。