• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头部受伤患者与对照组:发生频率的内隐测量与外显测量

Head-injured patients and control group: implicit versus explicit measures of frequency of occurrence.

作者信息

Vakil E, Biederman Y, Liran G, Groswasser Z, Aberbuch S

机构信息

Psychology Department, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1994 Aug;16(4):539-46. doi: 10.1080/01688639408402665.

DOI:10.1080/01688639408402665
PMID:7962358
Abstract

This study was conducted in order to investigate the possibility that effortful processes are involved in the retrieval stage of the putative automatic task-frequency judgment. Head-injured (HI) and control groups were tested on a frequency of occurrence task under explicit-intentional retrieval (i.e., frequency estimation) and implicit-unintentional retrieval (i.e., word-stem priming) conditions. Subjects were presented with a list of nouns that appeared once, three times, and six times. Following presentation, subjects were first given a priming task, then a recall task, and finally a frequency judgment task. Although the control group performed better than the HI group on recall and frequency judgment tasks, the groups did not differ on the priming task. The results are discussed in terms of the relationship between effortful and automatic memory processes.

摘要

进行这项研究是为了调查在假定的自动任务频率判断的检索阶段是否涉及到费力的过程。对头部受伤(HI)组和对照组在明确有意检索(即频率估计)和隐含无意检索(即词干启动)条件下进行出现频率任务测试。向受试者呈现出现一次、三次和六次的名词列表。呈现之后,首先给受试者一个启动任务,然后是回忆任务,最后是频率判断任务。尽管对照组在回忆和频率判断任务上的表现优于HI组,但两组在启动任务上没有差异。根据费力的和自动的记忆过程之间的关系对结果进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Head-injured patients and control group: implicit versus explicit measures of frequency of occurrence.头部受伤患者与对照组:发生频率的内隐测量与外显测量
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1994 Aug;16(4):539-46. doi: 10.1080/01688639408402665.
2
Evaluating evidence for automaticity in frequency of occurrence judgments: a bias for bias?评估事件发生频率判断中自动化的证据:对偏差的偏差?
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1988 Oct;10(5):664-74. doi: 10.1080/01688638808402803.
3
Comparison between three memory tests: cued recall, priming and saving closed-head injured patients and controls.三种记忆测试的比较:线索回忆、启动效应以及对闭合性颅脑损伤患者和对照组的节省情况。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2003 Apr;25(2):274-82. doi: 10.1076/jcen.25.2.274.13637.
4
Dissociation of frequency and recency processing from list recall after severe closed head injury in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年重度闭合性颅脑损伤后频率和新近性加工与列表回忆的分离
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2000 Feb;22(1):1-15. doi: 10.1076/1380-3395(200002)22:1;1-8;FT001.
5
Role of imagery and verbal labeling in the performance of paired associates tasks by persons with closed head injury.意象和言语标记在闭合性颅脑损伤患者配对联想任务表现中的作用。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1994 Aug;16(4):630-9. doi: 10.1080/01688639408402674.
6
Learning people's names following severe closed-head injury.重度闭合性颅脑损伤后对人名的记忆
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1998 Apr;20(2):237-44. doi: 10.1076/jcen.20.2.237.1163.
7
Automatic temporal order judgment: the effect of intentionality of retrieval on closed-head-injured patients.自动时间顺序判断:检索意向对闭合性颅脑损伤患者的影响。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1991 Mar;13(2):291-8. doi: 10.1080/01688639108401044.
8
Word recall versus reading speed: evidence of preserved priming in head-injured patients.词汇回忆与阅读速度:脑损伤患者中启动效应保留的证据。
Brain Cogn. 1996 Jun;31(1):75-89. doi: 10.1006/brcg.1996.0026.
9
Declarative and nondeclarative sequence learning tasks: closed-head injured patients versus control participants.陈述性和非陈述性序列学习任务:闭合性颅脑损伤患者与对照参与者
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2001 Apr;23(2):207-14. doi: 10.1076/jcen.23.2.207.1209.
10
Implicit, explicit, and semantic memory functions in Alzheimer's disease and Huntington's disease.阿尔茨海默病和亨廷顿舞蹈病中的内隐记忆、外显记忆和语义记忆功能
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1991 Jul;13(4):479-94. doi: 10.1080/01688639108401065.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effects of Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury on Episodic Memory: a Meta-Analysis.中度至重度创伤性脑损伤对情景记忆的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2019 Sep;29(3):270-287. doi: 10.1007/s11065-019-09413-8. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
2
Procedural Memory Following Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Group Performance and Individual Differences on the Rotary Pursuit Task.中重度创伤性脑损伤后的程序性记忆:旋转追踪任务中的群体表现与个体差异
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Jul 19;13:251. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00251. eCollection 2019.
3
In a context of time: the impact of delay and exposure time on the emergence of memory context effects.
在时间背景下:延迟和暴露时间对记忆情境效应出现的影响。
Psychol Res. 2017 Jan;81(1):182-190. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0710-9. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
4
Training to Optimize Learning after Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤后优化学习的训练
Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. 2015 Jun 1;3(2):99-105. doi: 10.1007/s40141-015-0081-6.
5
Recovery of visual search following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.中重度创伤性脑损伤后视觉搜索功能的恢复
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2015;37(2):162-77. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2014.998170. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
6
Recovery of content and temporal order memory for performed activities following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.中重度创伤性脑损伤后对执行活动的内容和时间顺序记忆的恢复。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2012;34(3):256-68. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2011.633497. Epub 2012 Jan 6.