Suppr超能文献

应用免疫珠吸附法从抗精子抗体患者精液中筛选“无抗体”精子进行体外受精性能的自身对照研究。

Auto-controlled study on in-vitro fertilization performance with 'antibody-free' spermatozoa selected by immunobead adsorption from semen of patients with anti-sperm antibodies.

作者信息

Verheyen G, Tournaye H, Laurier K, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A

机构信息

Centre for Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 1994 Jun;9(6):1119-26. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138643.

Abstract

Selection of antibody-free spermatozoa by immunobead adsorption was performed as a preliminary test in order to check probable recovery before introducing the procedure in an in-vitro fertilization (IVF) trial. On this basis, only nine out of 21 couples could be allocated to the study on IVF, which was designed to compare fertilization rates obtained with the immuno-selected spermatozoa fraction versus the control swim-up fraction. The study comprised eight properly controlled IVF procedures with sibling oocytes. Despite the high severity of antibody-binding in the fresh semen [mean of 91% for immunoglobulin (Ig) G, 77% for IgA], selection of antibody-free spermatozoa was successful in seven out of eight cases (mean of 15% for IgG, 20% for IgA). Nevertheless, mean fertilization rate on a per patient basis was not different after using one of the two sperm preparation procedures. Four patients had similar fertilization rates with the two sperm fractions, while for three patients fertilization was achieved only with the immuno-depleted fraction. In terms of embryo quality, similar results between the two groups were obtained. Two pregnancies were obtained, one was obtained with swim-up-prepared spermatozoa alone; the second, a twin pregnancy, originated from both the swim-up and immuno-depleted sperm populations. From this study, it can be concluded that the technique of immunobead adsorption itself seems attractive for the selection of antibody-free spermatozoa, but can be applied only to a limited population of patients (< 50%) suffering from immunological male infertility. Furthermore, in cases where immunodepletion seemed successful, no consistent benefit was observed in terms of IVF performance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

为了在体外受精(IVF)试验中引入该程序之前检查可能的回收率,通过免疫珠吸附法进行无抗体精子的筛选作为初步试验。在此基础上,21对夫妇中只有9对可被分配到IVF研究中,该研究旨在比较免疫选择的精子部分与对照上浮部分的受精率。该研究包括8个使用同胞卵母细胞进行适当对照的IVF程序。尽管新鲜精液中抗体结合的严重程度很高[免疫球蛋白(Ig)G平均为91%,IgA平均为77%],但在8例中有7例成功筛选出无抗体精子(IgG平均为15%,IgA平均为20%)。然而,使用两种精子制备程序之一后,每位患者的平均受精率没有差异。4名患者使用两种精子部分的受精率相似,而3名患者仅使用免疫去除部分实现了受精。在胚胎质量方面,两组获得了相似的结果。获得了2次妊娠,1次仅使用上浮制备的精子;第2次是双胎妊娠,来自上浮和免疫去除的精子群体。从这项研究可以得出结论,免疫珠吸附技术本身似乎对筛选无抗体精子具有吸引力,但仅适用于患有免疫性男性不育的有限患者群体(<50%)。此外,在免疫去除似乎成功的情况下,在IVF性能方面未观察到一致的益处。(摘要截短至250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验