Suppr超能文献

精子筛选技术与体外受精结果。

Techniques of sperm selection and in vitro fertilization results.

作者信息

Leonetti T, Causio F, Cagnazzo G

机构信息

1st Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University of Bary, Italy.

出版信息

Acta Eur Fertil. 1995 Jan-Feb;26(1):31-4.

PMID:8923915
Abstract

This study was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of four techniques for sperm selection in vitro fertilization (IVF) programme. Swim Up, Percoll, Sedimentation and Mini-Percoll were evaluated in 440 IVF cycles. The various methods were performed according to the motility and the number of spermatozoa, and the degree of cellularity of the sample; Swim Up and Percoll were used when sperm count was superior 20 million/ml, Sedimentation and Mini-Percoll when the sperm count was less than 20 million/ml. There was no difference in fertilization rate and in the number of replaced embryos per transfer with Swim Up compared to Percoll procedure; the Sedimentation technique improved fertilization (p < 0.05) and embryos rate (p < 0.001) compared to Mini-Percoll sperm preparation. There was no difference in pregnancy rate with Swim Up compared to Percoll and Sedimentation compared to Mini-Percoll procedure. We conclude that with advanced reproductive procedures where serious sperm disorders exist, the choose of the tecnique of sperm selection, most appropriate, according with the motility and the number of spermatozoa, the debrits and nonspermatic cells of the semen, might produce a suspension of spermatozoa with high fertilization potential.

摘要

本研究旨在评估四种体外受精(IVF)程序中精子筛选技术的有效性。对440个IVF周期的上浮法、 Percoll法、沉降法和微量Percoll法进行了评估。根据精子活力、数量以及样本的细胞程度采用不同方法;当精子计数超过2000万/ml时,采用上浮法和Percoll法;当精子计数低于2000万/ml时,采用沉降法和微量Percoll法。与Percoll法相比,上浮法的受精率和每次移植所置换胚胎数量无差异;与微量Percoll精子制备法相比,沉降技术提高了受精率(p < 0.05)和胚胎率(p < 0.001)。上浮法与Percoll法相比、沉降法与微量Percoll法相比,妊娠率无差异。我们得出结论,在存在严重精子紊乱的先进生殖程序中,根据精子活力、数量、精液中的碎片和非精子细胞,选择最合适的精子筛选技术,可能会产生具有高受精潜力的精子悬液。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验