• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与其他同伴相比,家人和朋友对食物摄入产生的社会促进作用更大。

Family and friends produce greater social facilitation of food intake than other companions.

作者信息

de Castro J M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta 30303.

出版信息

Physiol Behav. 1994 Sep;56(3):445-5. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)90286-0.

DOI:10.1016/0031-9384(94)90286-0
PMID:7972393
Abstract

How the presence of other people increases the amount eaten in meals was investigated by studying the impact of different companions on the spontaneous intake of free-living humans. 515 adults were paid to maintain 7-day diaries of everything they ate or drank, the time of occurrence, self-rated hunger, anxiety, and elation, the number of other people present, and their gender and relationship to the subject. Meals eaten with other people were larger and longer in duration compared to meals eaten alone regardless of the relationship of the eating companion to the subject. However, relative to other companions, meals eaten with spouse and family were larger and eaten faster, while meals eaten with friends were larger and of longer duration. This was independent of the time of day with similar effects occurring with morning, noontime, and evening meals. In addition males produced greater social facilitation of intake in females but not in males. These results suggest that the presence of other people at a meal increases intake by extending the time spent at the meal, probably as a result of social interaction, and that family and friends have an even larger effect, probably by producing relaxation and a consequent disinhibition of restraint on intake.

摘要

通过研究不同同伴对自由生活的人的自发进食量的影响,探讨了他人在场如何增加进餐时的进食量。515名成年人获得报酬,记录他们7天内所吃所喝的一切、进食时间、自我评定的饥饿感、焦虑感和愉悦感、在场的其他人数量以及他们的性别和与受试者的关系。无论进食同伴与受试者的关系如何,与他人一起进餐时的食量都比独自进餐时大,且进餐时间更长。然而,相对于其他同伴,与配偶和家人一起进餐时食量更大且吃得更快,而与朋友一起进餐时食量更大且进餐时间更长。这与一天中的时间无关,早餐、午餐和晚餐都有类似的效果。此外,男性对女性的进食有更大的社交促进作用,但对男性则没有。这些结果表明,进餐时有他人在场会通过延长进餐时间来增加食量,这可能是社交互动的结果,而家人和朋友的影响更大,可能是因为他们能让人放松,从而解除对进食的抑制。

相似文献

1
Family and friends produce greater social facilitation of food intake than other companions.与其他同伴相比,家人和朋友对食物摄入产生的社会促进作用更大。
Physiol Behav. 1994 Sep;56(3):445-5. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)90286-0.
2
Social facilitation of duration and size but not rate of the spontaneous meal intake of humans.社会因素对人类自发进食的持续时间和食量有促进作用,但对进食速度没有影响。
Physiol Behav. 1990 Jun;47(6):1129-35. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(90)90363-9.
3
Social facilitation of the spontaneous meal size of humans occurs regardless of time, place, alcohol or snacks.人类自发进食量的社会促进作用不受时间、地点、酒精或零食的影响。
Appetite. 1990 Oct;15(2):89-101. doi: 10.1016/0195-6663(90)90042-7.
4
Circadian rhythms of the spontaneous meal pattern, macronutrient intake, and mood of humans.人类自发饮食模式、常量营养素摄入量和情绪的昼夜节律。
Physiol Behav. 1987;40(4):437-46. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(87)90028-x.
5
The amount eaten in meals by humans is a power function of the number of people present.
Physiol Behav. 1992 Jan;51(1):121-5. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(92)90212-k.
6
The effects of the spontaneous ingestion of particular foods or beverages on the meal pattern and overall nutrient intake of humans.特定食物或饮料的自发摄入对人类饮食模式和总体营养摄入的影响。
Physiol Behav. 1993 Jun;53(6):1133-44. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(93)90370-u.
7
Social facilitation of the spontaneous meal size of humans occurs on both weekdays and weekends.
Physiol Behav. 1991 Jun;49(6):1289-91. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(91)90365-u.
8
Age-related changes in spontaneous food intake and hunger in humans.人类自发性食物摄入量和饥饿感的年龄相关变化。
Appetite. 1993 Dec;21(3):255-72. doi: 10.1006/appe.1993.1044.
9
Social facilitation of eating among friends and strangers.朋友和陌生人之间进食的社会促进作用。
Appetite. 1994 Aug;23(1):1-13. doi: 10.1006/appe.1994.1030.
10
Situational effects on meal intake: A comparison of eating alone and eating with others.进餐情况对食物摄入量的影响:独自进餐与与他人一起进餐的比较。
Physiol Behav. 2006 Jul 30;88(4-5):498-505. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.04.025. Epub 2006 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Unveiling overeating patterns within digital longitudinal data on eating behaviors and contexts.揭示饮食行为和环境的数字纵向数据中的暴饮暴食模式。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Sep 17;8(1):567. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01698-9.
2
"Listening to understand," exploring postpartum women's perceptions of their social networks and social support in relation to their health behaviors and weight: A qualitative exploratory study.“倾听以理解”:一项定性探索性研究,探讨产后女性对其社交网络以及与健康行为和体重相关的社会支持的认知
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057241309774. doi: 10.1177/17455057241309774.
3
Satiating Capacity of Plant-Based Meat in Realistic Meal Contexts at Home.
植物性肉类在家庭实际用餐场景中的饱腹感
Foods. 2023 Nov 27;12(23):4280. doi: 10.3390/foods12234280.
4
PROTOCOL: The association between marital transitions and physical and mental health in late life: A systematic review.方案:晚年婚姻转变与身心健康之间的关联:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 8;18(2):e1252. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1252. eCollection 2022 Jun.
5
Social Environmental Predictors of Lapse in Dietary Behavior: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study Amongst Dutch Adults Trying to Lose Weight.社会环境因素对饮食行为变化的预测:荷兰成年人减肥过程中的生态瞬时评估研究。
Ann Behav Med. 2023 Jul 19;57(8):620-629. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaac077.
6
The energy density of meals and snacks consumed by young Australian adults (18-30 years old) are influenced by preparation location but not screen use nor social interactions: findings from the MYMeals wearable camera study.年轻澳大利亚成年人(18-30 岁)所食用的餐点和零食的能量密度受准备地点的影响,但不受屏幕使用或社交互动的影响:来自 MYMeals 可穿戴相机研究的发现。
J Nutr Sci. 2022 Sep 14;11:e76. doi: 10.1017/jns.2022.76. eCollection 2022.
7
Food Pleasure Profiles-An Exploratory Case Study of the Relation between Drivers of Food Pleasure and Lifestyle and Personality Traits in a Danish Consumer Segment.食物愉悦特征——丹麦消费者群体中食物愉悦驱动因素与生活方式及人格特质关系的探索性案例研究
Foods. 2022 Feb 28;11(5):718. doi: 10.3390/foods11050718.
8
Better together? Social distance affects joint probability discounting.更紧密的关系?社交距离会影响共同概率折扣。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Oct;50(7):1513-1529. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01290-6. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
9
Content Validation of a Chrononutrition Questionnaire for the General and Shift Work Populations: A Delphi Study.《普通人群和轮班人群的时间营养问卷的内容验证:一项德尔菲研究》。
Nutrients. 2021 Nov 15;13(11):4087. doi: 10.3390/nu13114087.
10
Peer Presence Effect on Numerosity and Phonological Comparisons in 4th Graders: When Working with a SchoolMate Makes Children More Adult-like.同伴在场对四年级学生数字和语音比较的影响:与同学一起学习时,孩子的表现更像成年人。
Biology (Basel). 2021 Sep 12;10(9):902. doi: 10.3390/biology10090902.