Boulet L P, Cournoyer I, Deschesnes F, Leblanc P, Nouwen A
Centre de Pneumologie de l'Hôpital Laval, Canadian Network of Respiratory Health Centres of Excellence, Sainte-Foy, Québec.
Thorax. 1994 Oct;49(10):965-70. doi: 10.1136/thx.49.10.965.
Perception of bronchoconstriction varies between individuals and its determinants remain to be identified. The perception of airflow obstruction and breathlessness during induced bronchoconstriction was studied, and the effects of anxiety, repetition of the stimulus, and bronchodilator needs on these measurements were examined in normal and asthmatic subjects.
Fifteen normal (control) and 25 asthmatic subjects had two consecutive methacholine inhalation tests to induce a 20-50% fall in FEV1. Evaluation of the perceived magnitude of airflow obstruction, breathlessness, level of anxiety generated, and bronchodilator needs was obtained before each FEV1 measurement on a modified Borg scale from 0 to 10.
Mean (SE) maximal fall in FEV1 in asthmatic and control subjects was of similar magnitude: test 1, 37.6 (1.4)% and 38.7 (3.1)%, and test 2, 36.0 (1.6)% and 27.7 (2.4)% respectively. There was a large interindividual variation in perception of airflow obstruction and breathlessness but, although they were well correlated in asthmatic subjects, they were perceived differently by the control subjects. Perception of airflow obstruction was greater in asthmatic subjects. The level of anxiety and the bronchodilator use were low and did not influence perception.
During induced bronchoconstriction, the overall perception of airflow obstruction and breathlessness were similar among asthmatic subjects but controls showed a higher perception of airflow obstruction for any given level of breathlessness. Asthmatic subjects perceived airflow obstruction and breathlessness to a greater degree than did controls but anxiety and bronchodilator need were not correlated with respiratory sensation. The variability of bronchodilator use for similar degrees of bronchoconstriction suggests that it may be misleading to assess the severity of asthma control using only this indirect measure.
个体对支气管收缩的感知存在差异,其决定因素仍有待确定。本研究对诱发支气管收缩期间气流受限和呼吸困难的感知进行了研究,并在正常人和哮喘患者中考察了焦虑、刺激重复以及支气管扩张剂需求对这些测量结果的影响。
15名正常(对照)受试者和25名哮喘患者连续进行两次乙酰甲胆碱吸入试验,以使第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)下降20% - 50%。在每次FEV1测量前,使用改良的Borg量表(范围为0至10)对气流受限的感知程度、呼吸困难程度、产生的焦虑水平以及支气管扩张剂需求进行评估。
哮喘患者和对照受试者FEV1的平均(标准误)最大下降幅度相似:试验1分别为37.6(1.4)%和38.7(3.1)%,试验2分别为36.0(1.6)%和27.7(2.4)%。气流受限和呼吸困难的感知存在较大的个体差异,尽管在哮喘患者中两者相关性良好,但对照受试者的感知有所不同。哮喘患者对气流受限的感知更强。焦虑水平和支气管扩张剂的使用较少,且不影响感知。
在诱发支气管收缩期间,哮喘患者对气流受限和呼吸困难的总体感知相似,但在任何给定的呼吸困难水平下,对照受试者对气流受限的感知更高。哮喘患者比对照受试者对气流受限和呼吸困难的感知程度更高,但焦虑和支气管扩张剂需求与呼吸感觉无关。相似程度支气管收缩时支气管扩张剂使用的变异性表明,仅使用这种间接指标评估哮喘控制的严重程度可能会产生误导。