Suppr超能文献

正常人和哮喘患者对急性或渐进性阻力负荷的感知。

Perception of acute or progressive resistive loads in normal and asthmatic subjects.

作者信息

Turcotte H, Tahan M, Leblanc P, Boulet L P

机构信息

Unité de Recherche, Hôpital Laval, Université Laval, Sainte-Foy, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Respiration. 1993;60(4):203-11. doi: 10.1159/000196200.

Abstract

To determine if the rapidity of increase in airway resistance influences its perception, we looked at the perception of acute and progressive expiratory resistive loads in 9 controls (CN) and 9 asthmatics (AS). Each had 4 single-blind tests in a randomized order, during which resistances were increased from 0 to 24 cm H2O/l/s in 1, 3 or 6 steps or decreased in 6 steps. Dyspnea scores were recorded on a modified Borg scale (0-10). FEV1 and lung volumes were measured in all subjects initially and after the last resistance applied during tests C and D. Tidal volume, respiratory rate, the ratio of inspiratory time over total breathing time (Ti/Ttot) and minute ventilation were measured throughout each test. Borg scores were not significantly different from one test to the other. Overall, AS tended to have a higher perception of resistive loads than CN, although it did not reach statistical significance. FEV1 did not change significantly in both groups between the tests and before and after application of resistances. Functional residual capacity was not significantly different between AS and CN or before and after the tests. Residual volume was higher in AS (mean of the 4 tests: 1.6 +/- 0.05 l) compared to CN (1.1 +/- 0.14 l) (p = 0.003) but was unchanged after the applied resistances. Ti/Ttot ratio was similar for AS and CN and decreased significantly from 0 to 24 cm H2O/l/s in both groups (all tests, p < 0.01). Respiratory rate was higher in CN than in AS at all resistances (p < 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

为了确定气道阻力增加的速度是否会影响其感知,我们观察了9名对照者(CN)和9名哮喘患者(AS)对急性和渐进性呼气阻力负荷的感知。每个人按随机顺序进行4次单盲测试,在此期间,阻力以1步、3步或6步从0增加到24 cmH₂O/l/s,或以6步降低。使用改良的Borg量表(0 - 10)记录呼吸困难评分。在测试C和D期间,对所有受试者最初以及施加最后一次阻力后测量第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV₁)和肺容积。在每次测试过程中测量潮气量、呼吸频率、吸气时间与总呼吸时间之比(Ti/Ttot)和分钟通气量。Borg评分在各次测试之间无显著差异。总体而言,AS对阻力负荷的感知倾向于高于CN,尽管未达到统计学显著性。两组在测试之间以及施加阻力前后FEV₁均无显著变化。AS和CN之间或测试前后的功能残气量无显著差异。与CN(1.1±0.14 l)相比,AS的残气量更高(4次测试的平均值:1.6±0.05 l)(p = 0.003),但在施加阻力后未改变。AS和CN的Ti/Ttot比值相似,两组在阻力从0增加到24 cmH₂O/l/s时均显著降低(所有测试,p < 0.01)。在所有阻力水平下,CN的呼吸频率均高于AS(p < 0.001)。(摘要截断于250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验