Haagsma C J, van Riel P L, de Rooij D J, Vree T B, Russel F J, van't Hof M A, van de Putte L B
Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Br J Rheumatol. 1994 Nov;33(11):1049-55. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/33.11.1049.
To compare efficacy, toxicity, and the pharmacokinetics of the combination of sulphasalazine (SASP) and methotrexate (MTX) vs MTX alone in the treatment of SASP-resistant RA we conducted a controlled open clinical trial. Forty RA patients with active arthritis despite adequate SASP therapy, were allocated randomly to regimes of either SASP+MTX or MTX alone. The patients were evaluated openly by a single observer for 24 weeks. In the first 15 patients using the combination, pharmacokinetics of MTX without and with SASP were studied. Thirty-eight patients completed the trial. The mean decrease in the disease activity score in the group of patients receiving the combination was significantly greater than in the MTX group (-2.6 vs -1.3 respectively). The same pattern was seen concerning the other efficacy variables. There was no difference in the occurrence of toxicity. SASP had no influence on the pharmacokinetics of MTX. In conclusion in this open study the efficacy of the combination of MTX and SASP seems to be superior to MTX alone, the toxicity of both therapies was similar. This effect was not explained by the pharmacokinetics of MTX which were not altered by concomitant SASP administration.
为比较柳氮磺胺吡啶(SASP)与甲氨蝶呤(MTX)联合用药和单用MTX治疗对SASP耐药的类风湿关节炎(RA)的疗效、毒性及药代动力学,我们进行了一项对照开放临床试验。40例尽管接受了充分的SASP治疗但仍有关节炎活动的RA患者,被随机分配至SASP+MTX组或单用MTX组。由一名观察者对患者进行24周的开放评估。在最初使用联合用药的15例患者中,研究了单用MTX及与SASP合用时MTX的药代动力学。38例患者完成了试验。接受联合用药组患者的疾病活动评分平均下降幅度显著大于MTX组(分别为-2.6和-1.3)。其他疗效变量也呈现相同模式。毒性发生情况无差异。SASP对MTX的药代动力学无影响。总之,在这项开放研究中,MTX与SASP联合用药的疗效似乎优于单用MTX,两种治疗的毒性相似。这种效应无法用MTX药代动力学来解释,因为同时给予SASP并未改变MTX的药代动力学。